CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 264Quantum many-body systemsAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Controlling the accuracy of the density-matrix renormalization-group method: The dynamical block state selection approach

Open access
Legeza, Ö., Röder, J., Hess, B. A.·2003·Physical Review B
DOI 10.1103/physrevb.67.125114
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We have applied the momentum space version of the density-matrix renormalization-group method (k-DMRG) in quantum chemistry in order to study the accuracy of the algorithm in this new context. We have shown numerically that it is possible to determine the desired accuracy of the method in advance of the calculations by dynamically controlling the truncation error and the number of block states using a novel protocol that we dubbed dynamical block state selection protocol. The relationship between the real error and truncation error has been studied as a function of the number of orbitals and the fraction of filled orbitals. We have calculated the ground state of the molecules ${\mathrm{CH}}_{2},$ ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O},$ and ${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ as well as the first excited state of ${\mathrm{CH}}_{2}.$ Our largest calculations were carried out with 57 orbitals, the largest number of block states was 1500--2000, and the largest dimensions of the Hilbert space of the superblock configuration was 800 000--1 200 000.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.67.125114

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. S. R. White, 1993, Phys. Rev. B, 48, 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 264

Related

Metadata

Authors
Legeza, Ö., Röder, J., & Hess, B. A.
Affiliations
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
ORCID
Legeza, Ö.
Venue
Physical Review B
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2003-03-19
Volume
67
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
DOI
10.1103/physrevb.67.125114
OpenAlex
W2081934208
Semantic Scholar
ec419d846edb465bf509e45e3122b708088f92da
Cited by
263
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Locations
  • Physical review. B, Condensed matter (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
density matrix renormalization group, momentum space, truncation error, accuracy control, quantum chemistry, excited states, CH2, water, F2, many-body systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review