The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors limiting the efficiency of molecular photovoltaic devices
Abstract
We present a simple model of a molecular photovoltaic device consisting of a two-level system, connected to external contacts by chains of one or more charge transporting orbitals. Electrons may be promoted in the two-level system by photon absorption, and charge transported to the external circuit by electron transfer between neighboring orbitals. Photon absorption and emission are described by a generalized Planck equation and electron transfer is described by nonadiabatic Marcus theory. We find the steady-state current by solving the set of coupled rate equations for electron transfer in the system under illumination as a function of bias applied to the contacts. We calculate monochromatic current-voltage characteristics and power conversion efficiency as a function of the system size, orbital energy levels, and electron transfer rates, and compare with the monochromatic detailed balance limit. Using realistic values of the energy levels and charge-transfer rates, we are able to reproduce a number of commonly observed features in the current-voltage characteristics. These include a ``kink'' in the current-voltage curve close to open circuit when large interfacial energy steps are present or mobilities are low, and a reduction of the open-circuit voltage and crossing of the light and dark current curves when interfacial recombination is strong. We show that open-circuit voltage is dominated by the acceptor-donor energy gap when recombination is important, and by the optical gap when recombination is low. We confirm previous reports that photovoltaic energy conversion can be achieved by interfacial asymmetry alone and that a potential difference between the electrodes is unnecessary. Improved photovoltaic efficiency of molecular heterojunctions requires ohmic contacts, improved charge-carrier mobilities, and tuning of the electron-transfer rates at the heterojunction. Maximizing the rate of charge separation does not necessarily lead to maximum efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electron transfer reactions in chemistry. Theory and experiment
Marcus, R. A. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.599 · Cited by 3,667
Cited by
Charge Photogeneration in Organic Solar Cells
Clarke, T. M., & Durrant, J. R. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900271s · Cited by 2,372
Small Molecule Organic Semiconductors on the Move: Promises for Future Solar Energy Technology
Mishra, A., & Bäuerle, P. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201102326 · Cited by 1,816
ULTRAFAST ELECTRON TRANSFER AT THE MOLECULE-SEMICONDUCTOR NANOPARTICLE INTERFACE
Anderson, N. A., & Lian, T. (2005) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094347 · Cited by 490
Itoh, E., Higuchi, Y., Furuhata, D., & Shirotori, T. (2011) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.7567/jjap.50.01bc14 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, J., Kirkpatrick, J., & Ravirajan, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-01-30
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2041801307
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors limiting the efficiency of molecular photovoltaic devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.69.035337
- The paper
- Nelson, J., Kirkpatrick, J., & Ravirajan, P. (2004). Factors limiting the efficiency of molecular photovoltaic devices. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.69.035337
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.