Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nanoscale study of conduction through carbon nanotube networks

Open access
Stadermann, M., Papadakis, S. J., Falvo, M. R., Novak, J., Snow, E., Fu, Q., Liu, J., Fridman, Y., Boland, J. J., Superfine, R., Washburn, S.·2004·Physical Review B

Abstract

We present local conductance measurements of carbon nanotube networks with nanometer scale resolution and show that there are discrete drops in conductance that correspond to junctions of metallic nanotubes and semiconducting nanotubes. The anomalies of these networks compared to thin films are shown, and a new method of discerning between semiconducting and metallic single-wall carbon nanotubes is demonstrated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.69.201402

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Stadermann, M., Papadakis, S. J., Falvo, M. R., Novak, J., Snow, E., Fu, Q., Liu, J., Fridman, Y., Boland, J. J., Superfine, R., & Washburn, S.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2004-05-18
Volume
69
Issue
20
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2036100534
Cited by
161
References
0
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoscale study of conduction through carbon nanotube networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.69.201402
The paper
Stadermann, M., Papadakis, S. J., Falvo, M. R., Novak, J., Snow, E., Fu, Q., Liu, J., Fridman, Y., Boland, J. J., Superfine, R., & Washburn, S. (2004). Nanoscale study of conduction through carbon nanotube networks. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.69.201402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.