Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Decoherence in Josephson-junction qubits due to critical-current fluctuations

Open access
Van Harlingen, D. J., Robertson, T. L., Plourde, B. L. T., Reichardt, P. A., Crane, T. A., Clarke, John·2004·Physical Review B

Abstract

We compute the decoherence caused by $1∕f$ fluctuations at low frequency $f$ in the critical current ${I}_{0}$ of Josephson junctions incorporated into flux, phase, charge, and hybrid flux-charge superconducting quantum bits (qubits). The dephasing time ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ scales as ${I}_{0}∕\ensuremath{\Omega}\ensuremath{\Lambda}{S}_{{I}_{0}}^{1∕2}(1\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{Hz})$, where $\ensuremath{\Omega}∕2\ensuremath{\pi}$ is the energy-level splitting frequency, ${S}_{{I}_{0}}(1\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{Hz})$ is the spectral density of the critical-current noise at $1\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{Hz}$, and $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\mid}{I}_{0}d\ensuremath{\Omega}∕\ensuremath{\Omega}d{I}_{0}\ensuremath{\mid}$ is a parameter computed for given parameters for each type of qubit that specifies the sensitivity of the level splitting to critical-current fluctuations. Computer simulations show that the envelope of the coherent oscillations of any qubit after time $t$ scales as $\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}{t}^{2}∕2{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{2})$ when the dephasing due to critical-current noise dominates the dephasing from all sources of dissipation. We compile published results for fluctuations in the critical current of Josephson tunnel junctions fabricated with different technologies and a wide range in ${I}_{0}$ and area $\mathcal{A}$, and show that their values of ${S}_{{I}_{0}}(1\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{Hz})$ scale to within a factor of 3 of $[144{({I}_{0}∕\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{A})}^{2}∕(\mathcal{A}∕\ensuremath{\mu}{\mathrm{m}}^{2})]{(\mathrm{pA})}^{2}∕\mathrm{Hz}$ at $4.2\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$. We empirically extrapolate ${S}_{{I}_{0}}^{1∕2}(1\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{Hz})$ to lower temperatures using a scaling $T(\mathrm{K})∕4.2$. Using this result, we find that the predicted values of ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ at $100\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{mK}$ range from $0.8\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}\text{to}\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}12\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{s}$, and are usually substantially longer than values measured experimentally at lower temperatures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.70.064517

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Van Harlingen, D. J., Robertson, T. L., Plourde, B. L. T., Reichardt, P. A., Crane, T. A., & Clarke, J.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2004-08-30
Volume
70
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2021381768
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decoherence in Josephson-junction qubits due to critical-current fluctuations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.70.064517
The paper
Van Harlingen, D. J., Robertson, T. L., Plourde, B. L. T., Reichardt, P. A., Crane, T. A., & Clarke, J. (2004). Decoherence in Josephson-junction qubits due to critical-current fluctuations. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.70.064517

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.