The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantum criticality beyond the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm
Open accessAbstract
We present the critical theory of a number of zero-temperature phase transitions of quantum antiferromagnets and interacting boson systems in two dimensions. The most important example is the transition of the $S=1∕2$ square lattice antiferromagnet between the N\'eel state (which breaks spin rotation invariance) and the paramagnetic valence bond solid (which preserves spin rotation invariance but breaks lattice symmetries). We show that these two states are separated by a second-order quantum phase transition. This conflicts with Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson theory, which predicts that such states with distinct broken symmetries are generically separated either by a first-order transition, or by a phase with co-existing orders. The critical theory of the second-order transition is not expressed in terms of the order parameters characterizing either state, but involves fractionalized degrees of freedom and an emergent, topological, global conservation law. A closely related theory describes the superfluid-insulator transition of bosons at half filling on a square lattice, in which the insulator has a bond density wave order. Similar considerations are shown to apply to transitions of antiferromagnets between the valence bond solid and the ${Z}_{2}$ spin liquid: the critical theory has deconfined excitations interacting with an emergent $\mathrm{U}(1)$ gauge force. We comment on the broader implications of our results for the study of quantum criticality in correlated electron systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Orús, R. (2014) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 · Cited by 2,255
The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applications
Poland, D., Rychkov, S., & Vichi, A. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015002 · Cited by 760
Sandvik, A. W. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.227202 · Cited by 517
Deconfined Quantum Critical Points: Symmetries and Dualities
Wang, C., Nahum, A., Metlitski, M. A., Xu, C., & Senthil, T. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.031051 · Cited by 359
Self-citationAlgebraic spin liquid as the mother of many competing orders
Hermele, M., Senthil, T., & Fisher, M. P. A. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.104404 · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Senthil, T., Balents, L., Sachdev, S., Vishwanath, A., & Fisher, M. P. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-10-15
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 14
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W1963617929
- Cited by
- 834
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum criticality beyond the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.70.144407
- The paper
- Senthil, T., Balents, L., Sachdev, S., Vishwanath, A., & Fisher, M. P. A. (2004). Quantum criticality beyond the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.70.144407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.