The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic properties of nearly defect-free maghemite nanocrystals
Abstract
Temperature variations of the magnetization $M$ and the electron magnetic resonance (EMR) parameters of maghemite $(\ensuremath{\gamma}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3})$ nanocrystals are reported for the $4\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}--300\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ range. Transmission electron microscopy of the nanocrystals shows them to be nearly spherical samples (aspect ratio $a∕b=1.15$) with diameter $D=7(1)\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$, and analysis of x-ray diffraction lines yields $D=6.4\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ with negligible strain. $M$ versus $T$ data show blocking temperatures ${T}_{B}\ensuremath{\simeq}101\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$, $89\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$, and $68\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ in measuring fields $H=50$, 100, and $200\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{Oe}$ respectively. $M$ versus $H$ data for $T>{T}_{B}$ fits the modified Langevin function $M={M}_{s}\mathcal{L}({\ensuremath{\mu}}_{p}H∕{k}_{B}T)+{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{a}H$ with ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{p}=8000(500){\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}∕\text{particle}$ and ${M}_{s}=80\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{emu}∕\mathrm{g}$, identical to ${M}_{s}$ for bulk $\ensuremath{\gamma}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$. It is argued that this large value of ${M}_{s}$, the small value of coercivity ${H}_{c}\ensuremath{\simeq}20\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{Oe}$ at $5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$, the lack of exchange bias in a field-cooled sample, and negligible strain point to nearly defect-free nanocrystals. In the EMR studies, two resonance lines are observed, one with the resonance field ${H}_{r}$ greater than that for the free-electron value and the other smaller. From the temperature variations of ${H}_{r}$ and the linewidths of the two lines, it is argued that the two lines are, respectively, due to nanocrystals with easy-axis aligned perpendicular and parallel to the applied field. The relatively narrow intrinsic linewidths $(\ensuremath{\simeq}400\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{Oe})$ of the two lines in nearly defect-free nanocrystals facilitated their observation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monodisperse FePt Nanoparticles and Ferromagnetic FePt Nanocrystal Superlattices
Sun, S., Murray, C. B., Weller, D., Folks, L., & Moser, A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5460.1989 · Cited by 6,137
Cited by
Amorphous Iron(III) OxideA Review
Machala, L., Zboril, R., & Gedanken, A. (2007) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp064992s · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Dutta, P., Manivannan, A., Seehra, M. S., Shah, N., & Huffman, G. P.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-11-17
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 17
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W1992673798
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic properties of nearly defect-free maghemite nanocrystals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.70.174428
- The paper
- Dutta, P., Manivannan, A., Seehra, M. S., Shah, N., & Huffman, G. P. (2004). Magnetic properties of nearly defect-free maghemite nanocrystals. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.70.174428
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.