The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyperfine interaction in a quantum dot: Non-Markovian electron spin dynamics
Open accessAbstract
We have performed a systematic calculation for the non-Markovian dynamics of a localized electron spin interacting with an environment of nuclear spins via the Fermi contact hyperfine interaction. This work applies to an electron in the $s$-type orbital ground state of a quantum dot or bound to a donor impurity, and is valid for arbitrary polarization $p$ of the nuclear spin system, and arbitrary nuclear spin $I$ in high magnetic fields. In the limit of $p=1$ and $I=\frac{1}{2}$, the Born approximation of our perturbative theory recovers the exact electron spin dynamics. We have found the form of the generalized master equation (GME) for the longitudinal and transverse components of the electron spin to all orders in the electron spin-nuclear spin flip-flop terms. Our perturbative expansion is regular, unlike standard time-dependent perturbation theory, and can be carried out to higher orders. We show this explicitly with a fourth-order calculation of the longitudinal spin dynamics. In zero magnetic field, the fraction of the electron spin that decays is bounded by the smallness parameter $\ensuremath{\delta}=1∕{p}^{2}N$, where $N$ is the number of nuclear spins within the extent of the electron wave function. However, the form of the decay can only be determined in a high magnetic field, much larger than the maximum Overhauser field. In general the electron spin shows rich dynamics, described by a sum of contributions with nonexponential decay, exponential decay, and undamped oscillations. There is an abrupt crossover in the electron spin asymptotics at a critical dimensionality and shape of the electron envelope wave function. We propose a scheme that could be used to measure the non-Markovian dynamics using a standard spin-echo technique, even when the fraction that undergoes non-Markovian dynamics is small.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preskill, J. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0167 · Cited by 994
Cited by
Coherent manipulation of single spins in semiconductors
Hanson, R., & Awschalom, D. D. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07129 · Cited by 503
Mode Locking of Electron Spin Coherences in Singly Charged Quantum Dots
Greilich, A., Yakovlev, D. R., Shabaev, A., Efros, A. L., Yugova, I. A., Oulton, R., Stavarache, V., Reuter, D., Wieck, A., & Bayer, M. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128215 · Cited by 444
Observation of an anomalous decoherence effect in a quantum bath at room temperature
Huang, P., Kong, X., Zhao, N., Shi, F., Wang, P., Rong, X., Liu, R.-B., & Du, J. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1579 · Cited by 87
Non-Markovian dynamics of a single electron spin coupled to a nuclear spin bath
Ferraro, E., Breuer, H.-P., Napoli, A., Jivulescu, M. A., & Messina, A. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.064309 · Cited by 75
Fabrication process and failure analysis for robust quantum dots in silicon
Dodson, J. P., Holman, N., Thorgrimsson, B., Neyens, S. F., MacQuarrie, E. R., McJunkin, T., Foote, R. H., Edge, L. F., Coppersmith, S. N., & Eriksson, M. A. (2020) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/1361-6528/abb559 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Coish, W. A., & Loss, D.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2004-11-24
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 19
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2005715199
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperfine interaction in a quantum dot: Non-Markovian electron spin dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.70.195340
- The paper
- Coish, W. A., & Loss, D. (2004). Hyperfine interaction in a quantum dot: Non-Markovian electron spin dynamics. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.70.195340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.