Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Femtosecond laser pulse irradiation of solid targets as a general route to nanoparticle formation in a vacuum

Amoruso, S., Ausanio, G., Bruzzese, R., Vitiello, M., Wang, X.·2005·Physical Review B

Abstract

By studying the fs laser produced plume of different materials we show experimentally that the process of matter removal during ultrashort (fs) laser pulse irradiation followed by vacuum expansion is characterized by a number of general features, whichever the nature of the target material. In particular, fs laser ablation of solid targets at laser intensities of the order of ${10}^{12}\ensuremath{-}{10}^{13}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{W}∕{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$, inevitably leads to the generation of nanoparticles of that material. This has been evidenced by atomic force microscopy analysis of less than one layer deposits showing that the produced nanoparticles have mean radii generally in the range 5--25 nm, with pretty narrow size distributions. These results are in very good agreement with the physical description and numerical predictions of recently published theoretical analyses of fs ablation processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.71.033406

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Amoruso, S., Ausanio, G., Bruzzese, R., Vitiello, M., & Wang, X.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2005-01-21
Volume
71
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2076299652
Cited by
284
References
1
FWCI
22.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.