Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 853

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved analytical fit of gold dispersion: Application to the modeling of extinction spectra with a finite-difference time-domain method

Vial, Alexandre, Grimault, Anne-Sophie, Macías, Demetrio, Barchiesi, Dominique, de la Chapelle, Marc Lamy·2005·Physical Review B

Abstract

We propose an accurate description for the dispersion of gold in the range of 1.24--2.48 eV. We implement this improved model in an FDTD algorithm and evaluate its efficiency by comparison with an analytical method. Extinction spectra of gold nanoparticle arrays are then calculated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.71.085416

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 853

Metadata

Authors
Vial, A., Grimault, A.-S., Macías, D., Barchiesi, D., & de la Chapelle, M. L.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2005-02-23
Volume
71
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2068868232
Cited by
853
References
18
FWCI
14.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved analytical fit of gold dispersion: Application to the modeling of extinction spectra with a finite-difference time-domain method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.71.085416
The paper
Vial, A., Grimault, A.-S., Macías, D., Barchiesi, D., & de la Chapelle, M. L. (2005). Improved analytical fit of gold dispersion: Application to the modeling of extinction spectra with a finite-difference time-domain method. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.71.085416

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.