Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Putting competing orders in their place near the Mott transition

Open access
Balents, Leon, Bartosch, Lorenz, Burkov, Anton, Sachdev, Subir, Sengupta, Krishnendu·2005·Physical Review B

Abstract

We describe the localization transition of superfluids on two-dimensional lattices into commensurate Mott insulators with average particle density $p∕q$ ($p,q$ relatively prime integers) per lattice site. For bosons on the square lattice, we argue that the superfluid has at least $q$ degenerate species of vortices which transform under a projective representation of the square-lattice space group (a PSG). The formation of a single-vortex condensate produces the Mott insulator, which is required by the PSG to have density wave order at wavelengths of $q∕n$ lattice sites ($n$ integer) along the principle axes; such a second-order transition is forbidden in the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson frame-work. We also discuss the superfluid-insulator transition in the direct boson representation and find that an interpretation of the quantum criticality in terms of deconfined fractionalized bosons is only permitted at special values of $q$ for which a permutative representation of the PSG exists. We argue [and demonstrate in detail in a companion paper: L. Balents et al., following paper, Phys. Rev. B 71, 144509 (2005)] that our results apply essentially unchanged to electronic systems with short-range pairing, with the PSG determined by the particle density of Cooper pairs. We also describe the effect of static impurities in the superfluid: the impurities locally break the degeneracy between the $q$ vortex species, and this induces density-wave order near each vortex. We suggest that such a theory offers an appealing rationale for the local density-of-states modulations observed by Hoffman et al. [Science 295, 466 (2002)], in scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) studies of the vortex lattice of ${\mathrm{Bi}}_{2}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{2}{\mathrm{CaCu}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{8+\ensuremath{\delta}}$ and allows a unified description of the nucleation of density-wave order in zero and finite magnetic fields. We note signatures of our theory that may be tested by future STM experiments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.71.144508

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Balents, L., Bartosch, L., Burkov, A., Sachdev, S., & Sengupta, K.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2005-04-19
Volume
71
Issue
14
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2162294716
Cited by
159
References
1
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Putting competing orders in their place near the Mott transition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.71.144508
The paper
Balents, L., Bartosch, L., Burkov, A., Sachdev, S., & Sengupta, K. (2005). Putting competing orders in their place near the Mott transition. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.71.144508

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.