Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highly confined electromagnetic fields in arrays of strongly coupled Ag nanoparticles

Open access
Sweatlock, L. A., Maier, S. A., Atwater, H. A., Penninkhof, J. J., Polman, A.·2005·Physical Review B

Abstract

Linear arrays of very small Ag nanoparticles (diameter $\ensuremath{\sim}10\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$, spacing $0--4\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$) were fabricated in sodalime glass using an ion irradiation technique. Optical extinction spectroscopy of the arrays reveals a large polarization-dependent splitting of the collective plasmon extinction band. Depending on the preparation condition, a redshift of the longitudinal resonance as large as $1.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$ is observed. Simulations of the three-dimensional electromagnetic field evolution are used to determine the resonance energy of idealized nanoparticle arrays with different interparticle spacings and array lengths. Using these data, the experimentally observed redshift is attributed to collective plasmon coupling in touching particles and/or in long arrays of strongly coupled particles. The simulations also indicate that for closely coupled nanoparticles ($1--2\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ spacing) the electromagnetic field is concentrated in nanoscale regions ($10\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{dB}$ radius: $3\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$) between the particles, with a 5000-fold local field intensity enhancement. In arrays of $1\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{nm}$-spaced particles the dipolar particle interaction extends to over 10 particles, while for larger spacing the interaction length decreases. Spatial images of the local field distribution in 12-particle arrays of touching particles reveal a particlelike coupled mode with a resonance at $1.8\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$ and a wirelike mode at $0.4\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.71.235408

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Sweatlock, L. A., Maier, S. A., Atwater, H. A., Penninkhof, J. J., & Polman, A.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2005-06-10
Volume
71
Issue
23
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2106564588
Cited by
266
References
2
FWCI
15.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly confined electromagnetic fields in arrays of strongly coupled Ag nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.71.235408
The paper
Sweatlock, L. A., Maier, S. A., Atwater, H. A., Penninkhof, J. J., & Polman, A. (2005). Highly confined electromagnetic fields in arrays of strongly coupled Ag nanoparticles. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.71.235408

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.