Cited by 111Strong Light-Matter InteractionsSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Spontaneous microcavity-polariton coherence across the parametric threshold: Quantum Monte Carlo studies

Open access
Carusotto, Iacopo, Ciuti, Cristiano·2005·Physical Review B

Abstract

We investigate the appearance of spontaneous coherence in the parametric emission from planar semiconductor microcavities in the strong coupling regime. Calculations are performed by means of a quantum Monte Carlo technique based on the Wigner representation of the coupled exciton and cavity-photon fields. The numerical results are interpreted in terms of a nonequilibrium phase transition occurring at the parametric oscillation threshold: below the threshold, the signal emission is incoherent, and both the first and the second-order coherence functions have a finite correlation length which becomes macroscopic as the threshold is approached. Above the threshold, the emission is instead phase coherent over the whole two-dimensional sample and intensity fluctuations are suppressed. Similar calculations for quasi-one-dimensional microcavities show that in this case the phase coherence of the signal emission has a finite extension even above the threshold, while intensity fluctuations are suppressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.72.125335

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the truncated Wigner approximation, effects beyond mean-field can be described by adding a stochastic white noise term to the right-hand side of the equation of motion (39).

    “Within a semiclassical approach, effects beyond the mean-field can be described within the so-called truncated Wigner approximation [55,79] by adding a stochastic white noise term ξ(r ∥ , t ) on the right-hand side of the motion equation ( 39)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 2 B. Deveaud, A. Quattropani, P. Schwendimann (eds.), Proceedings of the International School of Physics 'Enrico Fermi', Course CL: Electron and Photon Confinement in Semiconductor Nanostructures (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2003).
  2. 1 E. Burstein and C. Weisbuch (eds.), Confined Electrons and Photons (Plenum Press, New York, 1995).
  3. 5 D. Pines and P. Nozieres, The theory of quantum liquids Vols.1 and 2 (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1966).
  4. 4 I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 , 166401 (2004); C. Ciuti and I. Carusotto, preprint cond-mat/0502585. · arXiv
  5. 6 L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein condensation (Oxford University Press, 2003).
  6. 11 for a review about exciton BEC, see: A. Griffin, D. W. Snoke, and S. Stringari (editors), Bose-Einstein Condensation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995). Recent experiments in this direction are reported, e.g. by L. V. Butov, C. W. Lai, A. L. Ivanov, A. C. Gossard, and D. S. Chemla, Nature 417 , 47 (2002); D. Snoke, S. Denev, Y. Liu, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West Nature 418 , 754 (2002); J. P. Eisenstein and A. H. MacDonald Nature 432 , 691 (2004) and references therein.
  7. 15 M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
  8. 16 D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
  9. 23 G. Dasbach, M. Schwab, M. Bayer, and A. Forchel,Phys. Rev. B 64 , 201309 (2001); G. Dasbach, M. Schwab, M. Bayer, D.N. Krizhanovskii, and A. Forchel, Phys. Rev. B 66 , 201201 (2002); G. Dasbach, C. Diederichs, J. Tignon, C. Ciuti, Ph. Roussignol, C. Delalande, M. Bayer, and A. Forchel, Phys. Rev. A, in press (2005).
  10. 42 K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics , Wiley, New York, 1997.
  11. 44 Y. Castin, in 'Coherent atomic matter waves', Lecture Notes of Les Houches Summer School, p.1-136, edited by R. Kaiser, C. Westbrook, and F. David, EDP Sciences and Springer-Verlag (2001), and references therein.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carusotto, I., & Ciuti, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2005-09-21
Volume
72
Issue
12
Pages
125335
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W1987198007
Cited by
111
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
microcavity polaritons, spontaneous coherence, semiconductor microcavities, strong coupling, nonequilibrium phase transitions, second-order coherence, intensity fluctuations, Wigner representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review