The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical excitations in organic molecules, clusters, and defects studied by first-principles Green’s function methods
Open accessAbstract
Spectroscopic and optical properties of nanosystems and point defects are discussed within the framework of Green's function methods. We use an approach based on evaluating the self-energy in the so-called GW approximation and solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation in the space of single-particle transitions. Plasmon-pole models or numerical energy integration, which have been used in most of the previous GW calculations, are not used. Fourier transforms of the dielectric function are also avoided. This approach is applied to benzene, naphthalene, passivated silicon clusters (containing more than one hundred atoms), and the $F$ center in LiCl. In the latter, excitonic effects and the $1s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}2p$ defect line are identified in the energy-resolved dielectric function. We also compare optical spectra obtained by solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation and by using time-dependent density-functional theory in the local, adiabatic approximation. From this comparison, we conclude that both methods give similar predictions for optical excitations in benzene and naphthalene, but they differ in the spectra of small silicon clusters. As cluster size increases, both methods predict very low cross section for photoabsorption in the optical and near ultraviolet ranges. For the larger clusters, the computed cross section shows a slow increase as a function of photon frequency. Ionization potentials and electron affinities of molecules and clusters are also calculated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 · Cited by 4,155
Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods
Martin, R. M. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805769 · Cited by 1,752
Application of the Green’s functions method to the study of the optical properties of semiconductors
Strinati, G. (1988) · La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento · doi:10.1007/bf02725962 · Cited by 571
Cited by
Fundamental Gaps in Finite Systems from Eigenvalues of a Generalized Kohn-Sham Method
Stein, T., Eisenberg, H., Kronik, L., & Baer, R. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.266802 · Cited by 469
The GW-Method for Quantum Chemistry Applications: Theory and Implementation
van Setten, M. J., Weigend, F., & Evers, F. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300648t · Cited by 284
Combining Wave Function Methods with Density Functional Theory for Excited States
Ghosh, S., Verma, P., Cramer, C. J., Gagliardi, L., & Truhlar, D. G. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00193 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Tiago, M. L., & Chelikowsky, J. R.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2006-05-18
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 20
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2077018396
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical excitations in organic molecules, clusters, and defects studied by first-principles Green’s function methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.73.205334
- The paper
- Tiago, M. L., & Chelikowsky, J. R. (2006). Optical excitations in organic molecules, clusters, and defects studied by first-principles Green’s function methods. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.73.205334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.