Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temperature dependence of the resistance of metallic nanowires of diameter⩾15nm: Applicability of Bloch-Grüneisen theorem

Open access
Bid, Aveek, Bora, Achyut, Raychaudhuri, A. K.·2006·Physical Review B

Abstract

We have measured the resistances (and resistivities) of Ag and Cu nanowires of diameters ranging from $15\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{to}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}200\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ in the temperature range $4.2--300\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ with the specific aim of assessing the applicability of the Bloch-Gr\"uneisen formula for electron-phonon resistivity in these nanowires. The wires were grown within polymeric templates by electrodeposition. We find that in all the samples the resistance reaches a residual value at $T=4.2\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ and the temperature dependence of resistance can be fitted to the Bloch-Gr\"uneisen formula in the entire temperature range with a well-defined transport Debye temperature $({\ensuremath{\Theta}}_{R})$. The values of the Debye temperature obtained from the fits lie within 8% of the bulk value for Ag wires of diameter $15\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ while for Cu nanowires of the same diameter the Debye temperature is significantly less than the bulk value. The electron-phonon coupling constants (measured by ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{\mathit{el}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathit{ph}}$ or ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{R}$) in the nanowires were found to have the same value as in the bulk. The resistivities of the wires were seen to increase as the wire diameter was decreased. This increase in the resistivity of the wires may be attributed to surface scattering of conduction electrons. The specularity $p$ was estimated to be about 0.5. The observed results allow us to obtain the resistivities exactly from the resistance and give us a method of obtaining the exact numbers of wires within the measured array (grown within the template).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.74.035426

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Bid, A., Bora, A., & Raychaudhuri, A. K.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2006-07-24
Volume
74
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2065876623
Cited by
414
References
17
FWCI
28.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temperature dependence of the resistance of metallic nanowires of diameter⩾15nm: Applicability of Bloch-Grüneisen theorem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.74.035426
The paper
Bid, A., Bora, A., & Raychaudhuri, A. K. (2006). Temperature dependence of the resistance of metallic nanowires of diameter⩾15nm: Applicability of Bloch-Grüneisen theorem. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.74.035426

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.