Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 242

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electronic transport in carbon nanotubes: From individual nanotubes to thin and thick networks

Skákalová, V., Kaiser, A. B., Woo, Y.-S., Roth, S.·2006·Physical Review B

Abstract

We measure and compare the electronic transport properties of individual multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) and individual single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), and SWNT networks of varying thickness. The thinnest SWNT networks, like the individual semiconducting SWNTs, show nonlinear current-voltage $(I\text{\ensuremath{-}}V)$ characteristics at low temperatures with a current that can be modulated by a gate-source voltage. The overall temperature dependence of conductance in the transparent networks changes systematically as the thickness of the network increases and is consistent with hopping conduction. On the other hand, the thickest SWNT networks (freestanding film) show more metallic behavior: their $I\text{\ensuremath{-}}V$ characteristics are linear with no gate-voltage effect, and a large fraction of their conductivity is retained at very low temperatures, consistent with tunneling through thin barriers separating metallic regions. We make a comparison with individual MWNTs, which in some cases show even greater retention of conductance at very low temperatures, but (unlike the thickest SWNT networks) no changeover to metallic temperature dependence at higher temperatures. The temperature dependence of conductance in individual MWNTs is consistent with a model involving conduction in the two outer shells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.74.085403

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 242

Metadata

Authors
Skákalová, V., Kaiser, A. B., Woo, Y.-S., & Roth, S.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2006-08-09
Volume
74
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2053125511
Cited by
242
References
2
FWCI
10.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.