The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrical properties and colossal electroresistance of heteroepitaxialSrRuO3∕SrTi1−xNbxO3(0.0002⩽x⩽0.02)Schottky junctions
Abstract
We investigated the electrical properties of heteroepitaxial oxide Schottky junctions, $\mathrm{Sr}\mathrm{Ru}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}∕\mathrm{Sr}{\mathrm{Ti}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Nb}}_{x}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ $(0.0002\ensuremath{\leqslant}x\ensuremath{\leqslant}0.02)$. The overall features agree with those of a conventional semiconductor Schottky junction, as exemplified by the rectifying current $(I)$-voltage $(V)$ characteristics with linear $\mathrm{log}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}I\text{\ensuremath{-}}V$ relationship under forward bias and the capacitance $(C)\text{\ensuremath{-}}V$ characteristics with linear $1∕{C}^{2}\text{\ensuremath{-}}V$ relationship under reverse bias. The $x$ dependence of the junction parameters, such as barrier height, built-in potential, and depletion layer width, can be analyzed by taking into account the band-gap narrowing due to degeneration, as well as the bias-dependent dielectric constant of depleted $\mathrm{Sr}\mathrm{Ti}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$. All junctions, except for the most heavily doped $(x=0.02)$ one, show hysteretic $I\text{\ensuremath{-}}V$ characteristics with a colossal electroresistance (CER) effect, where forward (reverse) bias stress reduces (enhances) the junction resistance. The $x$ dependence of the CER effect and the absence of hysteresis in the $C\text{\ensuremath{-}}V$ relationship suggest that the resistance switching in Schottky junctions comes from the change in conductance through additional tunneling paths rather than the change in barrier potential profile. Electron charging in or discharging from a self-trap depending on the bias polarity may account for the nonvolatility of the CER effect. This model is supported by the fact that the CER effect is completely suppressed in interface-engineered junctions with a $\mathrm{Sr}\mathrm{Ru}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}∕2\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{nm}$-thick $X∕\mathrm{Sr}{\mathrm{Ti}}_{0.99}{\mathrm{Nb}}_{0.01}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ structure, where $X$ is either pristine $\mathrm{Sr}\mathrm{Ti}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ or very heavily electron-doped ${\mathrm{La}}_{0.25}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{0.75}\mathrm{Ti}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Redox‐Based Resistive Switching Memories – Nanoionic Mechanisms, Prospects, and Challenges
Waser, R., Dittmann, R., Staikov, G., & Szot, K. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200900375 · Cited by 5,080
Kim, K. M., Jeong, D. S., & Hwang, C. S. (2011) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/22/25/254002 · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- Fujii, T., Kawasaki, M., Sawa, A., Kawazoe, Y., Akoh, H., & Tokura, Y.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-04-02
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W1989725244
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical properties and colossal electroresistance of heteroepitaxialSrRuO3∕SrTi1−xNbxO3(0.0002⩽x⩽0.02)Schottky junctions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.75.165101
- The paper
- Fujii, T., Kawasaki, M., Sawa, A., Kawazoe, Y., Akoh, H., & Tokura, Y. (2007). Electrical properties and colossal electroresistance of heteroepitaxialSrRuO3∕SrTi1−xNbxO3(0.0002⩽x⩽0.02)Schottky junctions. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.75.165101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.