The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-consistentGWcalculations for semiconductors and insulators
Abstract
We present $GW$ calculations for small and large gap systems comprising typical semiconductors (Si, SiC, GaAs, GaN, ZnO, ZnS, CdS, and AlP), small gap semiconductors (PbS, PbSe, and PbTe), insulators (C, BN, MgO, and LiF), and noble gas solids (Ar and Ne). It is shown that the ${G}_{0}{W}_{0}$ approximation always yields too small band gaps. To improve agreement with experiment, the eigenvalues in the Green's function $G$ $(G{W}_{0})$ and in the Green's function and the dielectric matrix $(GW)$ are updated until self-consistency is reached. The first approximation leads to excellent agreement with experiment, whereas an update of the eigenvalues in $G$ and $W$ gives too large band gaps for virtually all materials. From a pragmatic point of view, the $G{W}_{0}$ approximation thus seems to be an accurate and still reasonably fast method for predicting quasiparticle energies in simple $sp$-bonded systems. We furthermore observe that the band gaps in materials with shallow $d$ states (GaAs, GaN, and ZnO) are systematically underestimated. We propose that an inaccurate description of the static dielectric properties of these materials is responsible for the underestimation of the band gaps in $G{W}_{0}$, which is itself a result of the incomplete cancellation of the Hartree self-energy within the $d$ shell by local or gradient corrected density functionals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Cited by
Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B., & Wolverton, C. (2013) · JOM · doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 · Cited by 2,584
Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b907148b · Cited by 1,648
Accurate Quasiparticle Spectra from Self-Consistent GW Calculations with Vertex Corrections
Shishkin, M., Marsman, M., & Kresse, G. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.246403 · Cited by 734
Self-citationTheoretical Insights into Heterogeneous (Photo)electrochemical CO2Reduction
Xu, S., & Carter, E. A. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00481 · Cited by 652
Guo, R., Wang, X., Kuang, Y., & Huang, B. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.115202 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Shishkin, M., & Kresse, G.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-06-04
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 23
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2077391932
- Cited by
- 966
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-consistentGWcalculations for semiconductors and insulators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.75.235102
- The paper
- Shishkin, M., & Kresse, G. (2007). Self-consistentGWcalculations for semiconductors and insulators. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.75.235102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.