Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electron knock-on cross section of carbon and boron nitride nanotubes

Zobelli, A., Gloter, A., Ewels, C. P., Seifert, G., Colliex, C.·2007·Physical Review B

Abstract

We present a theoretical description of electron irradiation of single-walled carbon and boron nitride nanotubes. In a first step, the anisotropy of the atomic emission energy threshold is obtained within extended molecular-dynamics simulations based on the density-functional tight-binding method. In a second step, we numerically derive the total Mott cross section for different emission sites as a function of the incident electron energy. Two regimes are then described: at low irradiation energies (below $300\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{keV}$), the atoms are preferentially ejected from the upper and lower parts of the tube, while at high energies (above $300\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{keV}$), the atoms are preferentially ejected from the side walls. Typical values from a fraction of barn (at side wall for $150\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{keV}$ electron) up to around $20\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{barn}$ (for $1\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{MeV}$ electrons) are obtained for the total cross section of knock-on processes for both C and BN nanotubes. These values are smaller than those previously reported using isotropic models and the main reasons for the discrepancies are discussed. Finally, in boron nitride nanotubes, we report that the emission energy threshold maps show boron sputtering to be more favorable for low irradiation energies, while nitrogen sputtering is more favorable at high energies. These calculations of the total knock-on cross section for various nanotubes can be used as a guideline for transmission electron microscopy experimentalists using high energy focused beams to shape nanotubes, and also more generally if electron irradiation is to be used to change nanotube properties such as their optical behavior or conductivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.75.245402

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Zobelli, A., Gloter, A., Ewels, C. P., Seifert, G., & Colliex, C.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2007-06-05
Volume
75
Issue
24
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W1967605976
Cited by
293
References
0
FWCI
9.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron knock-on cross section of carbon and boron nitride nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.75.245402
The paper
Zobelli, A., Gloter, A., Ewels, C. P., Seifert, G., & Colliex, C. (2007). Electron knock-on cross section of carbon and boron nitride nanotubes. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.75.245402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.