The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scanning tunneling microscopy fingerprints of point defects in graphene: A theoretical prediction
Abstract
Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) is one of the most appropriate techniques to investigate the atomic structure of carbon nanomaterials. However, the experimental identification of topological and nontopological modifications of the hexagonal network of $s{p}^{2}$ carbon nanostructures remains a great challenge. The goal of the present theoretical work is to predict the typical electronic features of a few defects that are likely to occur in $s{p}^{2}$ carbon nanostructures, such as atomic vacancy, divacancy, adatom, and Stone-Wales defect. The modifications induced by those defects in the electronic properties of the graphene sheet are investigated using first-principles calculations. In addition, computed constant-current STM images of these defects are calculated within a tight-binding approach in order to facilitate the interpretation of STM images of defected carbon nanostructures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M. I., Grigorieva, I. V., Dubonos, S. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04233 · Cited by 21,611
Cited by
Properties of graphene: a theoretical perspective
Abergel, D. S. L., Apalkov, V., Berashevich, J., Ziegler, K., & Chakraborty, T. (2010) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018732.2010.487978 · Cited by 1,152
Paredes, J. I., Villar-Rodil, S., Solís-Fernández, P., Martínez-Alonso, A., & Tascón, J. M. D. (2009) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la804216z · Cited by 707
Imaging and dynamics of light atoms and molecules on graphene
Meyer, J. C., Girit, C. O., Crommie, M. F., & Zettl, A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07094 · Cited by 517
Various defects in graphene: a review
Bhatt, M. D., Kim, H., & Kim, G. (2022) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ra01436j · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Amara, H., Latil, S., Meunier, V., Lambin, P., & Charlier, J.-C.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-09-18
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W1972447761
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scanning tunneling microscopy fingerprints of point defects in graphene: A theoretical prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.76.115423
- The paper
- Amara, H., Latil, S., Meunier, V., Lambin, P., & Charlier, J.-C. (2007). Scanning tunneling microscopy fingerprints of point defects in graphene: A theoretical prediction. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.76.115423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.