Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ab initio prediction of stable boron sheets and boron nanotubes: Structure, stability, and electronic properties

Yang, Xiaobao, Ding, Yi, Ni, Jun·2008·Physical Review B

Abstract

Using first-principles calculations, we predict a novel stable boron sheet and boron nanotubes which show various electronic properties. The boron sheet is flat and has the structure that the two centers of each three hexagons in the hexagonal lattice are filled with additional atoms, which preserves the symmetry of the triangular lattice. The boron sheet is metal, and there are bands similar to the $\ensuremath{\pi}$ bands in the graphene near the Fermi level. Rolled from the sheet, the nanotubes with diameter larger than $17\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\AA{}}$ are metals. Smaller nanotubes are semiconductors with the gap decreasing as the diameter and chiral angle increase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.77.041402

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 376

Metadata

Authors
Yang, X., Ding, Y., & Ni, J.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2008-01-02
Volume
77
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2022815920
Cited by
376
References
1
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.