Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of on-site Coulomb repulsion termUon the band-gap states of the reduced rutile (110)TiO2surface

Open access
Calzado, Carmen J., Hernández, Norge Cruz, Sanz, Javier Fdez.·2008·Physical Review B

Abstract

We present a study concerning the effect of the on site $d\text{\ensuremath{-}}d$ Coulomb interaction energy $U$ on the band-gap states of nonstoichiometric rutile (110) $\mathrm{Ti}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ surface. As well known, the excess electrons resulting from the formation of oxygen vacancies localize on the $\mathrm{Ti}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}3d$ orbitals forming band-gap states. Local density approximation (LDA) does not give a correct description of these band-gap states, either with or without gradient corrections. The failure of LDA is often attributed to an inadequate treatment of electron correlation in systems with localized orbitals and is commonly corrected with an empirical local Coulomb repulsion term, i.e., the $\mathrm{LDA}+U$ method. This study provides a completely general strategy to estimate the $U$ value in this kind of systems, illustrated here for reduced (110) $\mathrm{Ti}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ surface, well characterized from experiments. From ab initio embedded cluster configuration interaction calculations, combined with the effective Hamiltonian theory, a value of $U$ of $5.5\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$ is obtained, in good agreement with those reported for this system from x-ray photoemission spectroscopy experiments $(U=4.5\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV})$. It is observed that when the ab initio estimate of $U$ is injected into the periodic $\mathrm{LDA}+U$ calculations, a correct description of the gap states is obtained from the periodic $\mathrm{LDA}+U$ calculations. Additionally, the results indicate that the position of these states on the band gap strongly depends on the level at which lattice relaxation is taken into account, with significant differences between the density of states curves at the $\mathrm{LDA}+U$ level obtained using the optimal generalized gradient approximation or $\mathrm{LDA}+U$ geometries. These results suggest that this combined strategy could be a useful tool for those systems where electron correlation plays a key role, and no experimental data are available for the on-site Coulomb repulsion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.77.045118

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Calzado, C. J., Hernández, N. C., & Sanz, J. F.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2008-01-15
Volume
77
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W1967108360
Cited by
177
References
2
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.