The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ConservingGWscheme for nonequilibrium quantum transport in molecular contacts
Open accessAbstract
We give a detailed presentation of our recent scheme to include correlation effects in molecular transport calculations using the nonequilibrium Keldysh formalism. The scheme is general and can be used with any quasiparticle self-energy, but for practical reasons, we mainly specialize to the so-called $GW$ self-energy, widely used to describe the quasiparticle band structures and spectroscopic properties of extended and low-dimensional systems. We restrict the $GW$ self-energy to a finite, central region containing the molecule, and we describe the leads by density functional theory (DFT). A minimal basis of maximally localized Wannier functions is applied both in the central $GW$ region and the leads. The importance of using a conserving, i.e., fully self-consistent, $GW$ self-energy is demonstrated both analytically and numerically. We introduce an effective spin-dependent interaction which automatically reduces self-interaction errors to all orders in the interaction. The scheme is applied to the Anderson model in and out of equilibrium. In equilibrium at zero temperature, we find that $GW$ describes the Kondo resonance fairly well for intermediate interaction strengths. Out of equilibrium, we demonstrate that the one-shot ${G}_{0}{W}_{0}$ approximation can produce severe errors, in particular, at high bias. Finally, we consider a benzene molecule between featureless leads. It is found that the molecule's highest occupied molecular orbital--lowest unoccupied molecular orbital gap as calculated in $GW$ is significantly reduced as the coupling to the leads is increased, reflecting the more efficient screening in the strongly coupled junction. For the $I\text{\ensuremath{-}}V$ characteristics of the junction, we find that Hartree--Fock (HF) and ${G}_{0}{W}_{0}[{G}_{\mathrm{HF}}]$ yield results closer to $GW$ than does DFT and ${G}_{0}{W}_{0}[{G}_{\mathrm{DFT}}]$. This is explained in terms of self-interaction effects and lifetime reduction due to electron-electron interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 · Cited by 4,155
Cited by
The GW-Method for Quantum Chemistry Applications: Theory and Implementation
van Setten, M. J., Weigend, F., & Evers, F. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300648t · Cited by 284
Iterative real-time path integral approach to nonequilibrium quantum transport
Weiss, S., Eckel, J., Thorwart, M., & Egger, R. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.195316 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Thygesen, K. S., & Rubio, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-03-18
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2133756169
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ConservingGWscheme for nonequilibrium quantum transport in molecular contacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.77.115333
- The paper
- Thygesen, K. S., & Rubio, A. (2008). ConservingGWscheme for nonequilibrium quantum transport in molecular contacts. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.77.115333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.