Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Δself-consistent field method to obtain potential energy surfaces of excited molecules on surfaces

Open access
Gavnholt, Jeppe, Olsen, Thomas, Engelund, Mads, Schiøtz, Jakob·2008·Physical Review B

Abstract

We present a modification of the $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ self-consistent field ($\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$) method of calculating energies of excited states in order to make it applicable to resonance calculations of molecules adsorbed on metal surfaces, where the molecular orbitals are highly hybridized. The $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ approximation is a density-functional method closely resembling standard density-functional theory (DFT), the only difference being that in $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ one or more electrons are placed in higher lying Kohn-Sham orbitals instead of placing all electrons in the lowest possible orbitals as one does when calculating the ground-state energy within standard DFT. We extend the $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ method by allowing excited electrons to occupy orbitals which are linear combinations of Kohn-Sham orbitals. With this extra freedom it is possible to place charge locally on adsorbed molecules in the calculations, such that resonance energies can be estimated, which is not possible in traditional $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ because of very delocalized Kohn-Sham orbitals. The method is applied to ${\text{N}}_{2}$, CO, and NO adsorbed on different metallic surfaces and compared to ordinary $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ without our modification, spatially constrained DFT, and inverse-photoemission spectroscopy measurements. This comparison shows that the modified $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ method gives results in close agreement with experiment, significantly closer than the comparable methods. For ${\text{N}}_{2}$ adsorbed on ruthenium (0001) we map out a two-dimensional part of the potential energy surfaces in the ground state and the $2\ensuremath{\pi}$ resonance. From this we conclude that an electron hitting the resonance can induce molecular motion, optimally with 1.5 eV transferred to atomic movement. Finally we present some performance test of the $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ approach on gas-phase ${\text{N}}_{2}$ and CO in order to compare the results to higher accuracy methods. Here we find that excitation energies are approximated with accuracy close to that of time-dependent density-functional theory. Especially we see very good agreement in the minimum shift of the potential energy surfaces in the excited state compared to the ground state.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.78.075441

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Gavnholt, J., Olsen, T., Engelund, M., & Schiøtz, J.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2008-08-27
Volume
78
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2055325187
Cited by
234
References
3
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.