The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Δself-consistent field method to obtain potential energy surfaces of excited molecules on surfaces
Open accessAbstract
We present a modification of the $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ self-consistent field ($\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$) method of calculating energies of excited states in order to make it applicable to resonance calculations of molecules adsorbed on metal surfaces, where the molecular orbitals are highly hybridized. The $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ approximation is a density-functional method closely resembling standard density-functional theory (DFT), the only difference being that in $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ one or more electrons are placed in higher lying Kohn-Sham orbitals instead of placing all electrons in the lowest possible orbitals as one does when calculating the ground-state energy within standard DFT. We extend the $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ method by allowing excited electrons to occupy orbitals which are linear combinations of Kohn-Sham orbitals. With this extra freedom it is possible to place charge locally on adsorbed molecules in the calculations, such that resonance energies can be estimated, which is not possible in traditional $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ because of very delocalized Kohn-Sham orbitals. The method is applied to ${\text{N}}_{2}$, CO, and NO adsorbed on different metallic surfaces and compared to ordinary $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ without our modification, spatially constrained DFT, and inverse-photoemission spectroscopy measurements. This comparison shows that the modified $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ method gives results in close agreement with experiment, significantly closer than the comparable methods. For ${\text{N}}_{2}$ adsorbed on ruthenium (0001) we map out a two-dimensional part of the potential energy surfaces in the ground state and the $2\ensuremath{\pi}$ resonance. From this we conclude that an electron hitting the resonance can induce molecular motion, optimally with 1.5 eV transferred to atomic movement. Finally we present some performance test of the $\ensuremath{\Delta}\text{SCF}$ approach on gas-phase ${\text{N}}_{2}$ and CO in order to compare the results to higher accuracy methods. Here we find that excitation energies are approximated with accuracy close to that of time-dependent density-functional theory. Especially we see very good agreement in the minimum shift of the potential energy surfaces in the excited state compared to the ground state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density
Henkelman, G., Arnaldsson, A., & Jónsson, H. (2006) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 · Cited by 10,723
Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems
Runge, E., & Gross, E. K. U. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.997 · Cited by 8,914
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 · Cited by 4,155
Cited by
Kale, M. J., Avanesian, T., Xin, H., Yan, J., & Christopher, P. (2014) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl502571b · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Gavnholt, J., Olsen, T., Engelund, M., & Schiøtz, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-08-27
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2055325187
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.