The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finite-size errors in continuum quantum Monte Carlo calculations
Open accessAbstract
We analyze the problem of eliminating finite-size errors from quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) energy data. We demonstrate that both (i) adding a recently proposed [S. Chiesa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 076404 (2006)] finite-size correction to the Ewald energy and (ii) using the model periodic Coulomb (MPC) interaction [L. M. Fraser et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 1814 (1996); P. R. C. Kent et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 1917 (1999); A. J. Williamson et al., Phys. Rev. B 55, R4851 (1997)] are good solutions to the problem of removing finite-size effects from the interaction energy in cubic systems provided the exchange-correlation (XC) hole has converged with respect to system size. However, we find that the MPC interaction distorts the XC hole in finite systems, implying that the Ewald interaction should be used to generate the configuration distribution. The finite-size correction of Chiesa et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 076404 (2006)] is shown to be incomplete in systems of low symmetry. Beyond-leading-order corrections to the kinetic energy are found to be necessary at intermediate and high densities; we investigate the effect of adding such corrections to QMC data for the homogeneous electron gas. We analyze finite-size errors in two-dimensional systems and show that the leading-order behavior differs from that which has hitherto been supposed. We compare the efficiencies of different twist-averaging methods for reducing single-particle finite-size errors and we examine the performance of various finite-size extrapolation formulas. Finally, we investigate the system-size scaling of biases in diffusion QMC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Twist-averaged boundary conditions in continuum quantum Monte Carlo algorithms
Lin, C., Zong, F. H., & Ceperley, D. M. (2001) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016702 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Continuum variational and diffusion quantum Monte Carlo calculations
Needs, R. J., Towler, M. D., Drummond, N. D., & López Ríos, P. (2010) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/2/023201 · Cited by 403
Self-citationThe uniform electron gas at warm dense matter conditions
Dornheim, T., Groth, S., & Bonitz, M. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.04.001 · Cited by 264
Path-Integral Monte Carlo Simulation of the Warm Dense Homogeneous Electron Gas
Brown, E. W., Clark, B. K., DuBois, J. L., & Ceperley, D. M. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.146405 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Drummond, N. D., Needs, R. J., Sorouri, A., & Foulkes, W. M. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-09-12
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2095691387
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finite-size errors in continuum quantum Monte Carlo calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.78.125106
- The paper
- Drummond, N. D., Needs, R. J., Sorouri, A., & Foulkes, W. M. C. (2008). Finite-size errors in continuum quantum Monte Carlo calculations. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.78.125106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.