Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 467

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infinite time-evolving block decimation algorithm beyond unitary evolution

Open access
Orús, R., Vidal, G.·2008·Physical Review B

Abstract

The infinite time-evolving block decimation algorithm [G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070201 (2007)] allows to simulate unitary evolution and to compute the ground state of one-dimensional (1D) quantum lattice systems in the thermodynamic limit. Here we extend the algorithm to tackle a much broader class of problems, namely, the simulation of arbitrary one-dimensional evolution operators that can be expressed as a (translationally invariant) tensor network. Relatedly, we also address the problem of finding the dominant eigenvalue and eigenvector of a one-dimensional transfer matrix that can be expressed in the same way. New applications include the simulation, in the thermodynamic limit, of open (i.e., master equation) dynamics and thermal states in 1D quantum systems, as well as calculations with partition functions in two-dimensional (2D) classical systems, on which we elaborate. The present extension of the algorithm also plays a prominent role in the infinite projected entangled-pair states approach to infinite 2D quantum lattice systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.78.155117

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3537 · DOI · Paper page
  2. D. Perez-Garcia, 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 401, 10.26421/QIC7.5-6-1 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.10345 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147902 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.040502 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.076401 · DOI · Paper page
  7. A. J. Daley, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp., 2004, 04005, 10.1088/1742-5468/2004/04/P04005 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00133-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1143/PTP.105.409 · DOI
  10. 10.1143/PTP.110.691 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016705 · DOI
  12. A. Gendiar, 2005, Acta Phys. Slov., 55, 141
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.033605 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.220405 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1143/JPSJ.64.3598 · DOI · Paper page
  16. T. Nishino, 1999, Transfer-Matrix Approach to Classical Systems, 10.1007/BFb0106067 · doi:10.1007/bfb0106067
  17. 10.1143/JPSJ.65.891 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1143/JPSJ.66.3040 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/0375-9601(96)00128-4 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.120601 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1143/JPSJ.64.4084 · DOI
  22. 10.1143/JPSJ.75.014003 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.207205 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.207204 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.070201 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022320 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1088/0305-4470/36/37/201 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.220601 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 467

Metadata

Authors
Orús, R., & Vidal, G.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2008-10-14
Volume
78
Issue
15
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W1550261137
Cited by
467
References
2
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.