The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Superlattice structures of graphene-based armchair nanoribbons
Open accessAbstract
Based on first-principles calculations we predict that periodically repeated junctions of armchair graphene nanoribbons of different widths form multiple quantum well structures. In these superlattice heterostructures the width as well as the energy-band gap is modulated in real space and specific states are confined in certain segments. Not only the size modulation, but also composition modulation, such as periodically repeated and commensurate heterojunctions of boron nitride and graphene honeycomb nanoribbons, results in a multiple quantum well structure. The geometrical features of the constituent nanoribbons, namely, their widths and lengths, the form of the junction, as well as the symmetry of the resulting superlattice, are the structural parameters available to engineer electronic properties of these quantum structures. We present our analysis regarding the variation of the band gaps and the confined states with these structural parameters. Calculation of transmission coefficient through a double barrier resonant tunneling device formed from a finite segment of such a multiple quantum well structure and placed between metallic electrodes yields resonant peaks which can be identified with electronic states confined in the well. We show that these graphene-based quantum structures can introduce interesting concepts to design nanodevices. Relevance of the quantum structures are discussed in view of the most recent experimental results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M. I., Grigorieva, I. V., Dubonos, S. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04233 · Cited by 21,611
Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems
Datta, S. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805776 · Cited by 7,704
Chiral tunnelling and the Klein paradox in graphene
Katsnelson, M. I., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. (2006) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys384 · Cited by 3,896
Cited by
Two- and One-Dimensional Honeycomb Structures of Silicon and Germanium
Cahangirov, S., Topsakal, M., Aktürk, E., Şahin, H., & Ciraci, S. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.236804 · Cited by 3,366
Self-citationProperties of graphene: a theoretical perspective
Abergel, D. S. L., Apalkov, V., Berashevich, J., Ziegler, K., & Chakraborty, T. (2010) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018732.2010.487978 · Cited by 1,152
Control of Thermal and Electronic Transport in Defect-Engineered Graphene Nanoribbons
Haskins, J., Kınacı, A., Sevik, C., Sevinçli, H., Cuniberti, G., & Çağın, T. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn200114p · Cited by 355
Self-citationEnhanced thermoelectric figure of merit in edge-disordered zigzag graphene nanoribbons
Sevinçli, H., & Cuniberti, G. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.113401 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sevinçli, H., Topsakal, M., & Ciraci, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-12-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 24
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W1575479489
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.