The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supercell size scaling of density functional theory formation energies of charged defects
Abstract
We address the calculation within density functional theory (DFT) of defect formation energies in alumina, a ceramic oxide often considered an archetype for a wide variety of other similar oxides. We examine the conditions under which calculated defect formation energies, especially those of charged defects, are independent of the principal approximations of the plane-wave DFT formalism, most significant of which is the finite-sized supercell in which the calculation must be performed. We introduce a variation on existing methods of extrapolation to infinite system size to reduce dependence of the result on finite-size errors in the electrostatic and elastic energies of a periodic supercell containing a defect. We also show how the results can be made relatively insensitive to the choice of exchange-correlation functional and pseudopotential by a suitable treatment of the chemical potentials of the atomic species. Our results for formation energies of charged defects are less sensitive than traditional approaches to supercell size and choices of exchange-correlation functional and pseudopotential, and differ notably from previous results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Norm-Conserving Pseudopotentials
Hamann, D. R., Schlüter, M., & Chiang, C. (1979) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.1494 · Cited by 4,511
Cited by
Electrostatics-based finite-size corrections for first-principles point defect calculations
Kumagai, Y., & Oba, F. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.195205 · Cited by 526
Finite-size supercell correction schemes for charged defect calculations
Komsa, H.-P., Rantala, T. T., & Pasquarello, A. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.045112 · Cited by 494
Defect levels through hybrid density functionals: Insights and applications
Alkauskas, A., Broqvist, P., & Pasquarello, A. (2011) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/pssb.201046195 · Cited by 300
First-principles study of oxygen-deficientLaNiO3structures
Malashevich, A., & Ismail-Beigi, S. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.144102 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Hine, N. D. M., Frensch, K., Foulkes, W. M. C., & Finnis, M. W.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-01-30
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2089472963
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.