The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum critical scaling of fidelity susceptibility
Open accessAbstract
The behavior of the ground-state fidelity susceptibility in the vicinity of a quantum critical point is investigated. We derive scaling relations describing its singular behavior in the quantum critical regime. Unlike in previous studies, these relations are solely expressed in terms of conventional critical exponents. We also describe in detail a quantum Monte Carlo scheme that allows for the evaluation of the fidelity susceptibility for a large class of many-body systems and apply it in the study of the quantum phase transition for the transverse-field Ising model on the square lattice. Finite-size analysis applied to the so-obtained numerical results confirms the validity of our scaling relations. Furthermore, we analyze the properties of a closely related quantity, the ground-state energy's second derivative, which can be numerically evaluated in a particularly efficient way. The usefulness of both quantities as alternative indicators of quantum criticality is examined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a—algebra
Uhlmann, A. (1976) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 · Cited by 1,649
FIDELITY APPROACH TO QUANTUM PHASE TRANSITIONS
GU, S.-J. (2010) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979210056335 · Cited by 663
Quantum critical scaling of the geometric tensors
Campos Venuti, L., & Zanardi, P. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.095701 · Cited by 499
Cited by
FIDELITY APPROACH TO QUANTUM PHASE TRANSITIONS
GU, S.-J. (2010) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979210056335 · Cited by 663
Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems
Kolodrubetz, M., Sels, D., Mehta, P., & Polkovnikov, A. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.07.001 · Cited by 326
At the limits of criticality-based quantum metrology: apparent super-Heisenberg scaling revisited
Rams, M. M., Sierant, P., Dutta, O., Horodecki, P., & Zakrzewski, J. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021022 · Cited by 160
Unbiasing time-dependent Variational Monte Carlo by projected quantum evolution
Sinibaldi, A., Giuliani, C., Carleo, G., & Vicentini, F. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-10-10-1131 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Albuquerque, A. F., Alet, F., Sire, C., & Capponi, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2010-02-18
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2046373397
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum critical scaling of fidelity susceptibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.81.064418
- The paper
- Albuquerque, A. F., Alet, F., Sire, C., & Capponi, S. (2010). Quantum critical scaling of fidelity susceptibility. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.81.064418
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.