The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Absence of topological insulator phases in non-HermitianPT-symmetric Hamiltonians
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large class of systems that are PT symmetric in the bulk must have edge states that break PT, namely, they have complex eigenvalues.
“That said, it was shown (Esaki et al., 2011;Hu and Hughes, 2011) that a large class of systems that are PT symmetric in the bulk must have edge states that”
From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Hughes, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Spin Hall Insulator State in HgTe Quantum Wells
König, M., Wiedmann, S., Brüne, C., Roth, A., Buhmann, H., Molenkamp, L. W., Qi, X.-L., & Zhang, S.-C. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1148047 · Cited by 6,151
Topological Insulators in Three Dimensions
Fu, L., Kane, C. L., & Mele, E. J. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.106803 · Cited by 4,651
A topological Dirac insulator in a quantum spin Hall phase
Hsieh, D., Qian, D., Wray, L., Xia, Y., Hor, Y. S., Cava, R. J., & Hasan, M. Z. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06843 · Cited by 3,523
Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians
Bender, C. M. (2007) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/70/6/r03 · Cited by 2,984
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.226801 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.106802 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1133734 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.121306 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.195322 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.1703863 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.1142 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195125 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195424 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.3149495 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5243 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physleta.2010.02.032 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.042101 · DOI
- 10.1142/S0217732305017664 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.3398 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.241102 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.245132 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.106802 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ozawa, T., Price, H. M., Amo, A., Goldman, N., Hafezi, M., Lu, L., Rechtsman, M. C., Schuster, D., Simon, J., Zilberberg, O., et al. (2019) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015006 · Cited by 3,722
Observation of topological edge states in parity–time-symmetric quantum walks
Xiao, L., Zhan, X., Bian, Z. H., Wang, K. K., Zhang, X., Wang, X. P., Li, J., Mochizuki, K., Kim, D., Kawakami, N., et al. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys4204 · Cited by 576
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, Y. C., & Hughes, T. L.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-10-07
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 15
- ISSN
- 1098-0121
- 1550-235X
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review