The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states
Open accessAbstract
We give a classification of gapped quantum phases of one-dimensional systems in the framework of matrix product states (MPS) and their associated parent Hamiltonians, for systems with unique as well as degenerate ground states and in both the absence and the presence of symmetries. We find that without symmetries, all systems are in the same phase, up to accidental ground-state degeneracies. If symmetries are imposed, phases without symmetry breaking (i.e., with unique ground states) are classified by the cohomology classes of the symmetry group, that is, the equivalence classes of its projective representations, a result first derived by Chen, Gu, and Wen [Phys. Rev. B 83, 035107 (2011)]. For phases with symmetry breaking (i.e., degenerate ground states), we find that the symmetry consists of two parts, one of which acts by permuting the ground states, while the other acts on individual ground states, and phases are labeled by both the permutation action of the former and the cohomology class of the latter. Using projected entangled pair states (PEPS), we subsequently extend our framework to the classification of two-dimensional phases in the neighborhood of a number of important cases, in particular, systems with unique ground states, degenerate ground states with a local order parameter, and topological order. We also show that in two dimensions, imposing symmetries does not constrain the phase diagram in the same way it does in one dimension. As a central tool, we introduce the isometric form, a normal form for MPS and PEPS, which is a renormalization fixed point. Transforming a state to its isometric form does not change the phase, and thus we can focus on to the classification of isometric forms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries
Chiu, C.-K., Teo, J. C. Y., Schnyder, A. P., & Ryu, S. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.035005 · Cited by 2,736
Orús, R. (2014) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 · Cited by 2,255
Quantum convolutional neural networks
Cong, I., Choi, S., & Lukin, M. D. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0648-8 · Cited by 1,517
Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group
Chen, X., Gu, Z.-C., Liu, Z.-X., & Wen, X.-G. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.155114 · Cited by 1,311
Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases
Levin, M., & Gu, Z.-C. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.115109 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuch, N., Pérez-García, D., & Cirac, I.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-10-31
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W1942206397
- Cited by
- 791
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.84.165139
- The paper
- Schuch, N., Pérez-García, D., & Cirac, I. (2011). Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.84.165139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.