Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 650

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correcting density functional theory for accurate predictions of compound enthalpies of formation: Fitted elemental-phase reference energies

Stevanović, Vladan, Lany, Stephan, Zhang, Xiuwen, Zunger, Alex·2012·Physical Review B

Abstract

Despite the great success that theoretical approaches based on density functional theory have in describing properties of solid compounds, accurate predictions of the enthalpies of formation ($\ensuremath{\Delta}{H}_{f}$) of insulating and semiconducting solids still remain a challenge. This is mainly due to incomplete error cancellation when computing the total energy differences between the compound total energy and the total energies of its elemental constituents. In this paper we present an approach based on GGA $+$ $U$ calculations, including the spin-orbit coupling, which involves fitted elemental-phase reference energies (FERE) and which significantly improves the error cancellation resulting in accurate values for the compound enthalpies of formation. We use an extensive set of 252 binary compounds with measured $\ensuremath{\Delta}{H}_{f}$ values (pnictides, chalcogenides, and halides) to obtain FERE energies and show that after the fitting, the 252 enthalpies of formation are reproduced with the mean absolute error $\text{MAE}=0.054$ eV/atom instead of $\text{MAE}\ensuremath{\approx}0.250$ eV/atom resulting from pure GGA calculations. When applied to a set of 55 ternary compounds that were not part of the fitting set the FERE method reproduces their enthalpies of formation with $\text{MAE}=0.048$ eV/atom. Furthermore, we find that contributions to the total energy differences coming from the spin-orbit coupling can be, to a good approximation, separated into purely atomic contributions which do not affect $\ensuremath{\Delta}{H}_{f}$. The FERE method, hence, represents a simple and general approach, as it is computationally equivalent to the cost of pure GGA calculations and applies to virtually all insulating and semiconducting compounds, for predicting compound $\ensuremath{\Delta}{H}_{f}$ values with chemical accuracy. We also show that by providing accurate $\ensuremath{\Delta}{H}_{f}$ the FERE approach can be applied for accurate predictions of the compound thermodynamic stability or for predictions of Li-ion battery voltages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.85.115104

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 650

Metadata

Authors
Stevanović, V., Lany, S., Zhang, X., & Zunger, A.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2012-03-07
Volume
85
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2065382771
Cited by
650
References
3
FWCI
13.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correcting density functional theory for accurate predictions of compound enthalpies of formation: Fitted elemental-phase reference energies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.85.115104
The paper
Stevanović, V., Lany, S., Zhang, X., & Zunger, A. (2012). Correcting density functional theory for accurate predictions of compound enthalpies of formation: Fitted elemental-phase reference energies. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.85.115104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.