Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Density functionals for surface science: Exchange-correlation model development with Bayesian error estimation

Open access
Wellendorff, Jess, Lundgaard, Keld T., Møgelhøj, Andreas, Petzold, Vivien, Landis, David D., Nørskov, Jens K., Bligaard, Thomas, Jacobsen, Karsten W.·2012·Physical Review B

Abstract

A methodology for semiempirical density functional optimization, using regularization and cross-validation methods from machine learning, is developed. We demonstrate that such methods enable well-behaved exchange-correlation approximations in very flexible model spaces, thus avoiding the overfitting found when standard least-squares methods are applied to high-order polynomial expansions. A general-purpose density functional for surface science and catalysis studies should accurately describe bond breaking and formation in chemistry, solid state physics, and surface chemistry, and should preferably also include van der Waals dispersion interactions. Such a functional necessarily compromises between describing fundamentally different types of interactions, making transferability of the density functional approximation a key issue. We investigate this trade-off between describing the energetics of intramolecular and intermolecular, bulk solid, and surface chemical bonding, and the developed optimization method explicitly handles making the compromise based on the directions in model space favored by different materials properties. The approach is applied to designing the Bayesian error estimation functional with van der Waals correlation (BEEF--vdW), a semilocal approximation with an additional nonlocal correlation term. Furthermore, an ensemble of functionals around BEEF--vdW comes out naturally, offering an estimate of the computational error. An extensive assessment on a range of data sets validates the applicability of BEEF--vdW to studies in chemistry and condensed matter physics. Applications of the approximation and its Bayesian ensemble error estimate to two intricate surface science problems support this.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.85.235149

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 1,461

Metadata

Authors
Wellendorff, J., Lundgaard, K. T., Møgelhøj, A., Petzold, V., Landis, D. D., Nørskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., & Jacobsen, K. W.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2012-06-27
Volume
85
Issue
23
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2328928309
Cited by
1,461
References
9
FWCI
20.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density functionals for surface science: Exchange-correlation model development with Bayesian error estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.85.235149
The paper
Wellendorff, J., Lundgaard, K. T., Møgelhøj, A., Petzold, V., Landis, D. D., Nørskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., & Jacobsen, K. W. (2012). Density functionals for surface science: Exchange-correlation model development with Bayesian error estimation. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.85.235149

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.