Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tkatchenko-Scheffler van der Waals correction method with and without self-consistent screening applied to solids

Bučko, Tomáš, Lebègue, S., Hafner, Jürgen, Ángyán, J. G.·2013·Physical Review B

Abstract

The method proposed by Tkatchenko and Scheffler [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 073005 (2009)] to correct density functional calculations for the missing van der Waals interactions is implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (vasp) code and tested on a wide range of solids, including noble-gas crystals, molecular crystals ($\ensuremath{\alpha}$-N${}_{2}$, sulfur dioxide, benzene, naphthalene, cytosine), layered solids (graphite, hexagonal boron nitride, vanadium pentoxide, MoS${}_{2}$, NbSe${}_{2}$), chain-like structures (selenium, tellurium, cellulose I), ionic crystals (NaCl, KI), and metals (nickel, zinc, cadmium). In addition to the original formulation expressing the van der Waals (vdW) corrections as pairwise potentials whose strength is derived from the rescaled polarizabilities of the neutral free atoms, the self-consistently screened ($\text{TS}+\text{SCS}$) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 236402 (2012)] variant of the method involving electrodynamic response effects has been examined. Analytical expressions for the forces acting on the atoms and for the components of the stress tensor needed for the relaxation of the volume and shape of the unit cell using the $\text{TS}+\text{SCS}$ method are derived. While the calculated structures are reasonably close to experiment, the van der Waals corrections to the binding energies are often found to be overestimated in comparison with experimental data. The $\text{TS}+\text{SCS}$ approach leads to significantly better results in some problematic cases, such as the binding energy of graphite. However, there is room for further improvements, in particular for strongly ionic systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.87.064110

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Bučko, T., Lebègue, S., Hafner, J., & Ángyán, J. G.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2013-02-26
Volume
87
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2313194977
Cited by
388
References
1
FWCI
20.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tkatchenko-Scheffler van der Waals correction method with and without self-consistent screening applied to solids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.87.064110
The paper
Bučko, T., Lebègue, S., Hafner, J., & Ángyán, J. G. (2013). Tkatchenko-Scheffler van der Waals correction method with and without self-consistent screening applied to solids. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.87.064110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.