The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine-learning approach for one- and two-body corrections to density functional theory: Applications to molecular and condensed water
Abstract
We show how machine learning techniques based on Bayesian inference can be used to enhance the computer simulation of molecular materials, focusing here on water. We train our machine-learning algorithm using accurate, correlated quantum chemistry, and predict energies and forces in molecular aggregates ranging from clusters to solid and liquid phases. The widely used electronic-structure methods based on density functional theory (DFT) by themselves give poor accuracy for molecular materials like water, and we show how our techniques can be used to generate systematically improvable one- and two-body corrections to DFT with modest extra resources. The resulting corrected DFT scheme is considerably more accurate than uncorrected DFT for the relative energies of small water clusters and different ice structures and significantly improves the description of the structure and dynamics of liquid water. However, our results for ice structures and the liquid indicate that beyond-two-body DFT errors cannot be ignored, and we suggest how our machine-learning methods can be further developed to correct these errors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Approximation Potentials: The Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics, without the Electrons
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.136403 · Cited by 3,242
Self-citationMolecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594
On representing chemical environments
Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.184115 · Cited by 2,572
Self-citationFast and Accurate Modeling of Molecular Atomization Energies with Machine Learning
Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.058301 · Cited by 2,312
Cited by
Constructing high‐dimensional neural network potentials: A tutorial review
Behler, J. (2015) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24890 · Cited by 884
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Deep learning for computational chemistry
Goh, G. B., Hodas, N. O., & Vishnu, A. (2017) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24764 · Cited by 809
Comparing molecules and solids across structural and alchemical space
De, S., Bartók, A. P., Csányi, G., & Ceriotti, M. (2016) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c6cp00415f · Cited by 778
Self-citationPrediction of higher-selectivity catalysts by computer-driven workflow and machine learning
Zahrt, A. F., Henle, J. J., Rose, B. T., Wang, Y., Darrow, W. T., & Denmark, S. E. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau5631 · Cited by 683
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartók, A. P., Gillan, M. J., Manby, F. R., & Csányi, G.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-08-08
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W1974672343
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine-learning approach for one- and two-body corrections to density functional theory: Applications to molecular and condensed water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.88.054104
- The paper
- Bartók, A. P., Gillan, M. J., Manby, F. R., & Csányi, G. (2013). Machine-learning approach for one- and two-body corrections to density functional theory: Applications to molecular and condensed water. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.88.054104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.