Cited by 26Quantum many-body systemsTheoretical and Computational PhysicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Optimal suppression of defect generation during a passage across a quantum critical point

Open access
Wu, Ning, Nanduri, Arun, Rabitz, Herschel·2015·Physical Review B

Abstract

The dynamics of quantum phase transitions are inevitably accompanied by the formation of defects when crossing a quantum critical point. For a generic class of quantum critical systems, we solve the problem of minimizing the production of defects through the use of a gradient-based deterministic optimal control algorithm. By considering a finite-size quantum Ising model with a tunable global transverse field, we show that an optimal power-law quench of the transverse field across the Ising critical point works well at minimizing the number of defects, in spite of being drawn from a subset of quench profiles. These power-law quenches are shown to be inherently robust against noise. The optimized defect density exhibits a transition at a critical ratio of the quench duration to the system size, which we argue coincides with the intrinsic speed limit for quantum evolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.91.041115

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 26

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]B. Damski, arXiv:1410.0059 (2014). · arXiv
  2. [16]S. Campbell, et al. , arXiv:1410.1555 (2014). · arXiv

Authors
Wu, N., Nanduri, A., & Rabitz, H.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2015-01-26
Volume
91
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-235X
OpenAlex
W2083574697
Cited by
26
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CHE-1058644)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-11-1-2068)
  • Princeton University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
quantum critical point, defect formation, quantum phase transitions, optimal control, quantum Ising model, transverse field, deterministic optimal control, noise robustness, defect density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review