The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interatomic potentials for ionic systems with density functional accuracy based on charge densities obtained by a neural network
Open accessAbstract
Based on an analysis of the short-range chemical environment of each atom in a system, standard machine-learning-based approaches to the construction of interatomic potentials aim at determining directly the central quantity, which is the total energy. This prevents, for instance, an accurate description of the energetics of systems in which long-range charge transfer or ionization is important. We propose therefore not to target directly with machine-learning methods the total energy but an intermediate physical quantity, namely, the charge density, which then in turn allows us to determine the total energy. By allowing the electronic charge to distribute itself in an optimal way over the system, we can describe not only neutral but also ionized systems with unprecedented accuracy. We demonstrate the power of our approach for both neutral and ionized NaCl clusters where charge redistribution plays a decisive role for the energetics. We are able to obtain chemical accuracy, i.e., errors of less than a millihartree per atom compared to the reference density functional results for a huge data set of configurations with large structural variety. The introduction of physically motivated quantities which are determined by the short-range atomic environment via a neural network also leads to an increased stability of the machine-learning process and transferability of the potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Neural-Network Representation of High-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces
Behler, J., & Parrinello, M. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.146401 · Cited by 5,010
Gaussian Approximation Potentials: The Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics, without the Electrons
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.136403 · Cited by 3,242
Cited by
Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science
Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S., & Marques, M. A. L. (2019) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0 · Cited by 2,607
Unke, O. T., Chmiela, S., Sauceda, H. E., Gastegger, M., Poltavsky, I., Schütt, K. T., Tkatchenko, A., & Müller, K.-R. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01111 · Cited by 1,647
Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations
Behler, J. (2016) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4966192 · Cited by 1,448
Four Generations of High-Dimensional Neural Network Potentials
Behler, J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00868 · Cited by 873
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghasemi, S. A., Hofstetter, A., Saha, S., & Goedecker, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2015-07-30
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W1596185547
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interatomic potentials for ionic systems with density functional accuracy based on charge densities obtained by a neural network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.92.045131
- The paper
- Ghasemi, S. A., Hofstetter, A., Saha, S., & Goedecker, S. (2015). Interatomic potentials for ionic systems with density functional accuracy based on charge densities obtained by a neural network. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.92.045131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.