Cited by 129Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallographyMultiferroics and related materials

Theory of antiferroelectric phase transitions

Open access
Tolédano, Pierre, Guennou, Mael·2016·Physical Review B

Abstract

At variance with structural ferroic phase transitions which give rise to macroscopic tensors coupled to macroscopic fields, criteria defining antiferroelectric (AFE) phase transitions are still under discussion due to the absence of specific symmetry properties characterizing their existence. They are recognized by the proximity of a ferroelectric (FE) phase induced under applied electric field, with a double hysteresis loop relating the induced polarization to the electric field and a typical anomaly of the dielectric permittivity. Here, we show that there exist indeed symmetry criteria defining AFE transitions. They relate the local symmetry of the polar crystallographic sites emerging at an AFE phase transition with the macroscopic symmetry of the AFE phase. The dielectric properties of AFE transitions are deduced from a Landau theoretical model in which ferroelectric and ferrielectric phases are shown to stabilize as the result of specific symmetry-allowed couplings of the AFE order parameter with the field-induced polarization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.94.014107

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extracted critical fields Ef and Ea do not drop to zero at Tc, but instead reach a plateau above 200 °C, suggesting these extracted fields above Tc might not have a physical meaning.

    “However, they [Fig.3(d)] do not drop to zero at Tc, as it could have been expected from past examples of E-T phase diagrams 33 or phenomenological theory.34 Instead, both values of E f and Ea seem to reach a plateau above 200 ○ C, suggesting that these extracted fields above Tc might not have a physical meaning.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tolédano, P., & Guennou, M.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire de physique des systèmes complexes (FR)
  • Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
94
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W2270589580
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (FNR/P12/4853155/Kreisel)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Multiferroics and related materials
Keywords
antiferroelectric phase transition, ferroelectric phase transition, ferrielectric phase, Landau theory, order parameter, dielectric permittivity anomaly, double hysteresis loop, field-induced polarization, dielectric properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review