Cited by 234Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitecturePhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

Variational optimization with infinite projected entangled-pair states

Open access
Corboz, Philippe·2016·Physical Review B

Abstract

An infinite projected entangled-pair state (iPEPS) is a powerful variational tensor network ansatz for two-dimensional ground states in the thermodynamic limit, and can be seen as a natural generalization of a matrix-product state to two dimensions. One of the main challenges in iPEPS simulations is the optimization of the tensors, i.e., finding the optimal variational parameters, in order to have the best representation of the ground state of a given Hamiltonian. The author presents a variational optimization scheme, in which the energy is minimized in an iterative way by sweeping over all the tensors in the ansatz, in a similar spirit as done in the density-matrix renormalization group method. Benchmark results for challenging problems are presented that show that the variational scheme yields considerably more accurate results than the previously best imaginary-time evolution algorithm, with a similar computational cost and with a faster convergence towards the ground state.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.94.035133

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The uniform MPS framework allows parametrizing fermionic states on the chain directly using the formalism of super vector spaces.

    “However, the uniform MPS framework allows to parametrize fermionic states on the chain directly using the formalism of super vector spaces [72].”

    From Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states (2019) · cites this paper as [72]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992). · DOI · Paper page
  2. F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac, Adv. Phys. 57, 143 (2008). · DOI
  3. U. Schollwöck, Ann. Phys. (NY) 326, 96 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  4. E. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 111 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  5. V. Murg, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 75, 033605 (2007). · DOI
  6. T. Nishino, Y. Hieida, K. Okunishi, N. Maeshima, Y. Akutsu, and A. Gendiar, Prog. Theor. Phys. 105, 409 (2001). · DOI
  7. M. Daniška and A. Gendiar, J. Phys. A 48, 435002 (2015). · DOI
  8. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 277 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  9. J. Jordan, R. Orús, G. Vidal, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 250602 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  10. P. Corboz, A. M. Läuchli, K. Penc, M. Troyer, and F. Mila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 215301 (2011). · DOI
  11. H. H. Zhao, C. Xu, Q. N. Chen, Z. C. Wei, M. P. Qin, G. M. Zhang, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. B 85, 134416 (2012). · DOI
  12. P. Corboz, M. Lajkó, A. M. Läuchli, K. Penc, and F. Mila, Phys. Rev. X 2, 041013 (2012). · DOI
  13. Z. Y. Xie, J. Chen, J. F. Yu, X. Kong, B. Normand, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. X 4, 011025 (2014). · DOI
  14. P. Corboz and F. Mila, Phys. Rev. B 87, 115144 (2013). · DOI
  15. Z.-C. Gu, H.-C. Jiang, D. N. Sheng, H. Yao, L. Balents, and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 88, 155112 (2013). · DOI
  16. J. Osorio Iregui, P. Corboz, and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. B 90, 195102 (2014). 035133-9 · DOI
  17. P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 046402 (2014). · DOI
  18. P. Corboz and F. Mila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 147203 (2014). · DOI
  19. T. Picot and D. Poilblanc, Phys. Rev. B 91, 064415 (2015). · DOI
  20. T. Picot, M. Ziegler, R. Orús, and D. Poilblanc, Phys. Rev. B 93, 060407(R) (2016). · DOI
  21. P. Corboz, Phys. Rev. B 93, 045116 (2016). · DOI
  22. P. Nataf, M. Lajkó, P. Corboz, A. M. Läuchli, K. Penc, and F. Mila, Phys. Rev. B 93, 201113(R) (2016). · DOI
  23. H. C. Jiang, Z. Y. Weng, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 090603 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  24. P. Corboz, R. Orus, B. Bauer, and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 81, 165104 (2010). · DOI
  25. H. N. Phien, J. A. Bengua, H. D. Tuan, P. Corboz, and R. Orus, Phys. Rev. B 92, 035142 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  26. T. Nishino and K. Okunishi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 891 (1996). · DOI
  27. T. Nishino and K. Okunishi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 3040 (1997). · DOI
  28. L. Vanderstraeten, M. Mariën, F. Verstraete, and J. Haegeman, Phys. Rev. B 92, 201111(R) (2015). · DOI
  29. F. Fröwis, V. Nebendahl, and W. Dür, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062337 (2010). · DOI
  30. A. Gendiar, N. Maeshima, and T. Nishino, Prog. Theor. Phys. 110, 691 (2003). · DOI
  31. P. Corboz, S. R. White, G. Vidal, and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. B 84, 041108 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  32. L. Wang, I. Pižorn, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. B 83, 134421 (2011). · DOI
  33. Y.-K. Huang, P. Chen, and Y.-J. Kao, Phys. Rev. B 86, 235102 (2012). · DOI
  34. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  35. S. Singh, R. N. C. Pfeifer, and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 83, 115125 (2011). · DOI
  36. B. Bauer, P. Corboz, R. Orús, and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. B 83, 125106 (2011). · DOI
  37. A. W. Sandvik, in Lectures on the Physics of Strongly Correlated Systems XIV: Fourteenth Training Course in the Physics of Strongly Correlated Systems, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 1297 (AIP, New York, 2010), pp. 135-338.
  38. B. Sriram Shastry and B. Sutherland, Physica B+C (Amsterdam) 108, 1069 (1981). · DOI
  39. H. Kageyama, K. Yoshimura, R. Stern, N. V. Mushnikov, K. Onizuka, M. Kato, K. Kosuge, C. P. Slichter, T. Goto, and Y. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3168 (1999). · DOI
  40. K. Onizuka, H. Kageyama, Y. Narumi, K. Kindo, Y. Ueda, and T. Goto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 1016 (2000). · DOI
  41. H. Kageyama, M. Nishi, N. Aso, K. Onizuka, T. Yosihama, K. Nukui, K. Kodama, K. Kakurai, and Y. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5876 (2000). · DOI
  42. K. Kodama, M. Takigawa, M. Horvatić, C. Berthier, H. Kageyama, Y. Ueda, S. Miyahara, F. Becca, and F. Mila, Science 298, 395 (2002). · DOI
  43. M. Takigawa, K. Kodama, M. Horvatić, C. Berthier, H. Kageyama, Y. Ueda, S. Miyahara, F. Becca, and F. Mila, Physica B (Amsterdam, Neth.) 346-347, 27 (2004). · DOI
  44. F. Levy, I. Sheikin, C. Berthier, M. Horvatić, M. Takigawa, H. Kageyama, T. Waki, and Y. Ueda, Europhys. Lett. 81, 67004 (2008). · DOI
  45. S. E. Sebastian, N. Harrison, P. Sengupta, C. D. Batista, S. Francoual, E. Palm, T. Murphy, N. Marcano, H. A. Dabkowska, and B. D. Gaulin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20157 (2008). · DOI
  46. M. Jaime, R. Daou, S. A. Crooker, F. Weickert, A. Uchida, A. E. Feiguin, C. D. Batista, H. A. Dabkowska, and B. D. Gaulin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12404 (2012). · DOI
  47. M. Takigawa, M. Horvatić, T. Waki, S. Krämer, C. Berthier, F. Lévy-Bertrand, I. Sheikin, H. Kageyama, Y. Ueda, and F. Mila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 067210 (2013). · DOI
  48. Y. H. Matsuda, N. Abe, S. Takeyama, H. Kageyama, P. Corboz, A. Honecker, S. R. Manmana, G. R. Foltin, K. P. Schmidt, and F. Mila, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 137204 (2013). · DOI
  49. A. Koga and N. Kawakami, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4461 (2000). · DOI
  50. Y. Takushima, A. Koga, and N. Kawakami, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 70, 1369 (2001). · DOI
  51. C. H. Chung, J. B. Marston, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 64, 134407 (2001). · DOI
  52. A. Läuchli, S. Wessel, and M. Sigrist, Phys. Rev. B 66, 014401 (2002). · DOI
  53. P. Corboz, G. Evenbly, F. Verstraete, and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. A 81, 010303(R) (2010). · DOI
  54. C. V. Kraus, N. Schuch, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 81, 052338 (2010). · DOI
  55. C. Pineda, T. Barthel, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. A 81, 050303 (2010). · DOI
  56. P. Corboz and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165129 (2009). · DOI
  57. I. Pižorn and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. B 81, 245110 (2010). · DOI
  58. L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, P. Corboz, and F. Verstraete, arXiv:1606.09170. · arXiv
  59. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 220405 (2007). · DOI
  60. G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180406 (2009). 035133-11 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corboz, P.
Affiliations
Institute for Theoretical Physics Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Corboz, Philippe
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2016-07-14
Volume
94
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W2348656099
Cited by
234
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap
  • Government of Canada
  • Industry Canada
  • Ministry of Research and Innovation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Keywords
infinite projected entangled pair states, variational optimization, matrix product states, thermodynamic limit, tensor optimization, density matrix renormalization group

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review