Cited by 150

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrafast generation of skyrmionic defects with vortex beams: Printing laser profiles on magnets

Fujita, Hiroyuki, Sato, Masahiro·2017·Physical Review B

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.95.054421

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There exist another kind of optical toroidal pulses that belong to a scalar light field with phase gradient lines resembling skyrmion structure rather than the real optical vector field.

    “Interestingly, there exist also another kind of optical toroidal pulses that belong to a scalar light field with the phase gradient lines resembling skyrmion structure rather than the real optical vector field [82,83].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 96

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.053601 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.190404 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nature08904 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.crhy.2013.09.014 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.826 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/28566 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.1058591 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.045205 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.218103 · DOI
  10. 10.1364/OE.18.002144 · DOI
  11. 10.1364/OE.18.017967 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/nl301347j · DOI
  13. F. Takahashi, 2013, CLEO: 2013
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.143603 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.1226204 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/ncomms5586 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4250 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/nature03564 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nphys1285 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.147202 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2731 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.259 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/ncomms1666 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.218 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.220401 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nmat3864 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.085150 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nphys3057 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.214413 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/ncomms7708 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/ncomms9190 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.147202 · DOI
  33. 10.1063/1.4939447 · DOI
  34. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/1/013045 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.249 · DOI
  36. 2012, Spin Current
  37. 2000, Magneto-Optics
  38. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.272 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0022-3697(58)90076-3 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRev.120.91 · DOI · Paper page
  41. A. A. Belavin, 1975, JETP Lett., 22, 245
  42. A. N. Bogdanov, 1989, J. Exp. Theor. Phys., 68, 101
  43. 10.1016/S0304-8853(97)90021-4 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0304-8853(94)90046-9 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/nature05056 · DOI
  46. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/6/065003 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/nnano.2013.29 · DOI
  48. 10.1126/science.1214143 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/ncomms1990 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/nnano.2013.243 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/srep06784 · DOI
  52. V. G. Bar'yakhtar, 1992, JETP Lett., 55, 624
  53. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.214410 · DOI
  54. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.147203 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/srep24795 · DOI
  56. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/7/075016 · DOI
  57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.174416 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/nnano.2013.210 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/ncomms5652 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/ncomms6148 · DOI
  61. 10.1063/1.4929727 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/aelm.201500180 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/srep22638 · DOI
  64. 10.1126/science.1240573 · DOI
  65. 10.1126/science.aaa1442 · DOI
  66. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04010 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)01038-5 · DOI
  68. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.177205 · DOI
  69. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.064412 · DOI
  70. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.094420 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 2012, The Angular Momentum of Light
  72. 10.1038/nnano.2013.174 · DOI
  73. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05257 · DOI
  74. 10.1038/nmat4593 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/nnano.2015.313 · DOI
  76. 10.1038/nnano.2015.315 · DOI
  77. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.083602 · DOI
  78. 10.1364/OL.36.004143 · DOI
  79. 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.175 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00321-6 · DOI
  81. 10.1103/PhysRev.143.574 · DOI
  82. 10.1021/nl501647t · DOI
  83. 10.1103/PhysRevX.2.031010 · DOI
  84. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.017601 · DOI
  85. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.075114 · DOI
  86. 10.1126/science.1166767 · DOI
  87. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.186602 · DOI
  88. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.197202 · DOI
  89. 10.1038/nature09124 · DOI
  90. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.041203 · DOI
  91. 10.1038/nmat2916 · DOI
  92. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.267201 · DOI
  93. S. Seki, 2016, Skyrmions in Magnetic Materials, 10.1007/978-3-319-24651-2 · DOI
  94. 10.1038/ncomms10542 · DOI
  95. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.107202 · DOI
  96. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.14937 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fujita, H., & Sato, M.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2017-02-16
Volume
95
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 2469-9950
  • 2469-9969
Cited by
150
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP16J04752, JP15H02117)
  • National Science Foundation (PHY11-25915)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review