Cited by 101Topological Materials and Phenomena2D Materials and ApplicationsAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics

Minimal models for topological Weyl semimetals

Open access
McCormick, Timothy M., Kimchi, Itamar, Trivedi, Nandini·2017·Physical Review B

Abstract

Topological Weyl semimetals (TWS) can be classified as type I TWS, in which the density of states vanishes at the Weyl nodes, and type II TWS, in which an electron pocket and a hole pocket meet at a singular point of momentum space, allowing for distinct topological properties. We consider various minimal lattice models for type II TWS. The simplest time-reversal-breaking band structure, with a pair of Weyl nodes sharing a single electron pocket and a single hole pocket (hydrogen model), exhibits relics of surface Fermi arc states only away from the Fermi energy, with no topological protection. Topologically protected Fermi arcs can be restored by an additional term (hydrogen model) that produces a bulk structure where the electron and hole pockets of each Weyl point are disjoint. In time-reversal-symmetric but inversion-breaking models, we identify nontopological surface track states that arise out of the topological Fermi arc states at the transition from type I to type II and persist in the type II TWS. The distinctions among these minimal models can aid in distinguishing between generic and model-dependent behavior in studies of superconductivity, magnetism, and quantum oscillations of type II Weyl semimetals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.95.075133

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Type II WSMs support an additional class of surface states called 'track states'.

    “In addition to arcs, McCormick et al. , 2017 have shown that Type II WSMs support an additional class of surface states they call 'track states'.”

    From Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids (2018) · cites this paper as McCormick et al. , 2017

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 101

Authors
McCormick, T. M., Kimchi, I., & Trivedi, N.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2017-02-21
Volume
95
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W2340737447
Cited by
101
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DMR-1309461, DMR-1420451)
  • Simons Foundation (343227)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
Keywords
Weyl semimetals, type-II Weyl semimetal, Weyl points, Fermi arcs, time-reversal symmetry breaking, inversion symmetry breaking, electron and hole pockets, topological surface states

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review