Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine learning vortices at the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition

Open access
Beach, Matthew J. S., Golubeva, Anna, Melko, Roger G.·2018·Physical Review B

Abstract

The authors extend the recent successful application of neural networks fordistinguishing phases of matter to the case of topologically driven phase transitions. They demonstrate that supervised networks correctly identify the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in the two-dimensional classical XY model. However, their analysis suggests that a naive classification of phases is based on bulk features, rather than on detecting local topological defects. While they show that it is possible to fine-tune a network to recognize vortices, it generally remains a difficult task to detect topological defects without $a\phantom{\rule{0.333em}{0ex}}p\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}r\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}i\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}o\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}r\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}i$ knowledge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.97.045207

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Beach, M. J. S., Golubeva, A., & Melko, R. G.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2018-01-25
Volume
97
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W2765597272
Cited by
167
References
4
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.