The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning vortices at the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition
Open accessAbstract
The authors extend the recent successful application of neural networks fordistinguishing phases of matter to the case of topologically driven phase transitions. They demonstrate that supervised networks correctly identify the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in the two-dimensional classical XY model. However, their analysis suggests that a naive classification of phases is based on bulk features, rather than on detecting local topological defects. While they show that it is possible to fine-tune a network to recognize vortices, it generally remains a difficult task to detect topological defects without $a\phantom{\rule{0.333em}{0ex}}p\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}r\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}i\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}o\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}r\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}i$ knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Deep learning for visual understanding: A review
Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Oerlemans, A., Lao, S., Wu, S., & Lew, M. S. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.116 · Cited by 2,504
Machine learning phases of matter
Carrasquilla, J., & Melko, R. G. (2017) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys4035 · Cited by 1,448
Self-citation
Cited by
Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science
Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S., & Marques, M. A. L. (2019) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0 · Cited by 2,607
Metadata
- Authors
- Beach, M. J. S., Golubeva, A., & Melko, R. G.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-01-25
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W2765597272
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.