Cited by 63Topological Materials and Phenomena2D Materials and ApplicationsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Detailed study of the Fermi surfaces of the type-II Dirac semimetallic candidates X Te 2 ( X =Pd, Pt)

Open access

Abstract

We present a detailed quantum oscillatory study on the Dirac type-II semimetallic candidates ${\mathrm{PdTe}}_{2}$ and ${\mathrm{PtTe}}_{2}$ via the temperature and the angular dependence of the de Haas--van Alphen and Shubnikov--de Haas effects. In high-quality single crystals of both compounds, i.e., displaying carrier mobilities between ${10}^{3}$ and ${10}^{4}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$/Vs, we observed a large nonsaturating magnetoresistivity which in ${\mathrm{PtTe}}_{2}$ at a temperature $T=1.3$ K leads to an increase in the resistivity up to ($5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{4}$)% under a magnetic field ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{0}H=62$ T. These high mobilities correlate with their light effective masses in the range of 0.04 to 1 bare electron mass according to our measurements. For ${\mathrm{PdTe}}_{2}$ the experimentally determined Fermi surface cross-sectional areas show excellent agreement with those resulting from band structure calculations. Surprisingly, this is not the case for ${\mathrm{PtTe}}_{2}$, whose agreement between calculations and experiments is relatively poor even when electronic correlations are included in the calculations. Therefore, our study provides strong support for the existence of a Dirac type-II node in ${\mathrm{PdTe}}_{2}$ and probably also for ${\mathrm{PtTe}}_{2}$. Band structure calculations indicate that the topologically nontrivial bands of ${\mathrm{PtTe}}_{2}$ do not cross the Fermi level ${\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}_{F}$. In contrast, for ${\mathrm{PdTe}}_{2}$ the Dirac type-II cone does intersect ${\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}_{F}$, although our calculations also indicate that the associated cyclotron orbit on the Fermi surface is located in a distinct ${k}_{z}$ plane with respect to that of the Dirac type-II node. Therefore, it should yield a trivial Berry phase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.97.235154

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple oscillation frequencies are often observed in most topological semimetals, such as the TaAs family and WHM materials with PbFCl-type structure.

    “However, multiple oscillation frequencies are often observed in most topological semimetals, such as those of the TaAs family (179, 180, 182, 183, 191-193, 227, 243) and WHM materials with PbFCl-type structure (W = Zr or Hf; H = Si, Ge, or Sn; M = S, Se, or Te) (156,221,222,226,228,232,233,241,242,244,245).”

    From Transport of Topological Semimetals (2019) · cites this paper as [227]

    The Results report multiple quantum-oscillation frequencies in PdTe₂ and PtTe₂, supporting an example of the phenomenon. The paper does not establish that this is often observed in most topological semimetals; its Introduction mentions the TaAs family in connection with Weyl nodes, not oscillation frequencies, and the cited passages do not address PbFCl-type WHM materials. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 63

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1038/nphys1270 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.140405 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.125427 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nature13763 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.165134 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.066402 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.121108 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/s41467-017-01758-z · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0038-1098(63)90358-2 · DOI
  10. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.19-0257 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.02.036 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.121117 · DOI
  13. 10.1088/0256-307X/32/6/067303 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41467-017-00280-6 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.016401 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.125102 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nmat5031 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.041201 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.075101 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.140505 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.220506 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.014523 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.156401 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.054515 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/srep31554 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF00115529 · DOI
  27. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S1093-3263(99)00028-5 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.10.015 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00206-0 · DOI
  31. 10.1088/0305-4608/7/9/017 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.125152 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.235101 · DOI
  34. 10.1063/1.4935240 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.121101 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.256601 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.016602 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.206401 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, W., Schönemann, R., Aryal, N., Zhou, Q., Rhodes, D., Chiu, Y.-C., Chen, K.-W., Kampert, E., Förster, T., Martin, T. J., McCandless, G. T., Chan, J. Y., Manousakis, E., & Balicas, L.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (DE)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2018-06-29
Volume
97
Issue
23
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W2798913254
Cited by
63
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0002613)
  • National Science Foundation (DMR-1700030, DMR-1644779)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Keywords
Fermi surface, type-II Dirac semimetal, PdTe2, PtTe2, de Haas-van Alphen effect, Shubnikov-de Haas effect, quantum oscillations, non-saturating magnetoresistance, carrier mobility, effective mass, Berry phase, topological band structure, cyclotron orbits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review