The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ab initio effective Hamiltonians for cuprate superconductors
Open accessAbstract
Ab initio low-energy effective Hamiltonians of two typical high-temperature copper-oxide superconductors, whose mother compounds are ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ and ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$, are derived by utilizing the multiscale ab initio scheme for correlated electrons (MACE). The effective Hamiltonians obtained in the present study serve as platforms of future studies to accurately solve the low-energy effective Hamiltonians beyond the density functional theory. It allows further study on the superconducting mechanism from first principles and a quantitative basis without adjustable parameters not only for the available cuprates but also for future design of higher ${T}_{\mathrm{c}}$ in general. More concretely, we derive effective Hamiltonians for three variations: (1) a one-band Hamiltonian for the antibonding orbital generated from strongly hybridized Cu $3{d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$ and O $2{p}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}$ orbitals, (2) a two-band Hamiltonian constructed from the antibonding orbital and Cu $3{d}_{3{z}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{r}^{2}}$ orbital hybridized mainly with the apex oxygen ${p}_{z}$ orbital, and (3) a three-band Hamiltonian consisting mainly of Cu $3{d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$ orbitals and two O $2{p}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}$ orbitals. Differences between the Hamiltonians for ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ and ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$, which have relatively low and high critical temperatures ${T}_{\mathrm{c}}$, respectively, at optimally doped compounds, are elucidated. The main differences are summarized as follows: (i) the oxygen $2{p}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}$ orbitals are farther ($\ensuremath{\sim}3.7$ eV) below from the Cu ${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$ orbital in the case of the La compound than the Hg compound ($\ensuremath{\sim}2.4$ eV) in the three-band Hamiltonian. This causes a substantial difference in the character of the ${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}\ensuremath{-}2{p}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}$ antibonding band at the Fermi level and makes the effective onsite Coulomb interaction $U$ larger for the La compound than the Hg compound for the two- and one-band Hamiltonians. (ii) The ratio of the second-neighbor to the nearest transfer ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}/t$ is also substantially different (0.26 for the Hg and 0.15 for the La compound) in the one-band Hamiltonian. Heavier entanglement of the two bands in the two-band Hamiltonian implies that the two-band rather than the one-band Hamiltonian is more appropriate for the La compound. The relevance of the three-band description is also discussed especially for the Hg compound.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The values t' = -0.2 for hole-doping and t' = +0.2 for electron-doping are appropriate for cuprates based on band structure calculations.
“Weuse t ′ = -0 . 2 for hole-doping and t ′ = +0 . 2 for electrondoping, appropriate values for based on cuprates based on band structure calculations ( 35, 36 ).”
From Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model (2024) · cites this paper as [36]
Table I (p. 18–19) reports negative t and positive t′ for two cuprates, giving t′/t ratios of approximately −0.26 and −0.15—consistent with using −0.2 as an approximate model value. The table does not assign that value specifically to hole doping, and the cited passages do not support +0.2 for electron doping. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1007/BF01303701 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0921-4534(94)02461-8 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.262.5130.97 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.4260 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14964 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1028 · DOI
- 10.1016/0375-9601(87)90806-1 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.61.749 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9028 · DOI
- 10.1143/JPSJ.79.112001 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.177007 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms6738 · DOI
- 10.1143/JPSJ.79.044705 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195104 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.195144 · DOI
- 10.7566/JPSJ.84.093703 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.075102 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.12847 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.035109 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.3060 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.8814 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.155134 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.176402 · DOI
- 10.1038/362226a0 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1024 · DOI
- M. Methfessel, 2000, in Lecture Notes in Physics
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.245125 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep12050 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.047003 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.057003 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3759 · DOI
- 10.1016/0038-1098(87)90407-8 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.1600664 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model
Xu, H., Chung, C.-M., Qin, M., Schollwöck, U., White, S. R., & Zhang, S. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh7691 · Cited by 144
“We used t 0 ¼ (cid:2) 0 : 2 for hole doping and t 0 ¼ þ 0 : 2 for electron doping, according to band-structure calculations in cuprates ( 35 , 36 ).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirayama, M., Yamaji, Y., Misawa, T., & Imada, M.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- The Institute for Solid State Physics, The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-10-02
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 13
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W2749851039
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (22104010, 16H06345, 16K17746, hp150173, hp150211, hp160201, hp170263)
- University of Tokyo
- RIKEN
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- cuprate superconductors, effective Hamiltonian, La2CuO4, HgBa2CuO4, orbital hybridization, critical temperature, superconducting mechanism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review