The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Many-body localization and delocalization in large quantum chains
Open accessAbstract
We theoretically study the quench dynamics for an isolated Heisenberg spin chain with a random on-site magnetic field, which is one of the paradigmatic models of a many-body localization transition. We use the time-dependent variational principle as applied to matrix product states, which allows us to controllably study chains of a length up to $L=100$ spins, i.e., much larger than $L\ensuremath{\simeq}20$ that can be treated via exact diagonalization. For the analysis of the data, three complementary approaches are used: (i) determination of the exponent $\ensuremath{\beta}$ which characterizes the power-law decay of the antiferromagnetic imbalance with time; (ii) similar determination of the exponent ${\ensuremath{\beta}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}$ which characterizes the decay of a Schmidt gap in the entanglement spectrum; and (iii) machine learning with the use, as an input, of the time dependence of the spin densities in the whole chain. We find that the consideration of the larger system sizes substantially increases the estimate for the critical disorder ${W}_{c}$ that separates the ergodic and many-body localized regimes, compared to the values of ${W}_{c}$ in the literature. On the ergodic side of the transition, there is a broad interval of the strength of disorder with slow subdiffusive transport. In this regime, the exponents $\ensuremath{\beta}$ and ${\ensuremath{\beta}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}$ increase, with increasing $L$, for relatively small $L$ but saturate for $L\ensuremath{\simeq}50$, indicating that these slow power laws survive in the thermodynamic limit. From a technical perspective, we develop an adaptation of the ``learning by confusion'' machine-learning approach that can determine ${W}_{c}$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249
The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states
Schollwöck, U. (2011) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 · Cited by 4,818
Chaos and quantum thermalization
Srednicki, M. (1994) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.50.888 · Cited by 3,175
Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system
Deutsch, J. M. (1991) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.43.2046 · Cited by 2,860
Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions
Choi, J.-Y., Hild, S., Zeiher, J., Schauß, P., Rubio-Abadal, A., Yefsah, T., Khemani, V., Huse, D. A., Bloch, I., & Gross, C. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf8834 · Cited by 979
Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states
Haegeman, J., Lubich, C., Oseledets, I., Vandereycken, B., & Verstraete, F. (2016) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.165116 · Cited by 804
Cited by
Quantum chaos challenges many-body localization
Šuntajs, J., Bonča, J., Prosen, T., & Vidmar, L. (2020) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.102.062144 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Doggen, E. V. H., Schindler, F., Tikhonov, K. S., Mirlin, A. D., Neupert, T., Polyakov, D. G., & Gornyi, I. V.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-11-08
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 17
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W2899961353
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Many-body localization and delocalization in large quantum chains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.98.174202
- The paper
- Doggen, E. V. H., Schindler, F., Tikhonov, K. S., Mirlin, A. D., Neupert, T., Polyakov, D. G., & Gornyi, I. V. (2018). Many-body localization and delocalization in large quantum chains. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.98.174202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.