Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Many-body localization and delocalization in large quantum chains

Open access
Doggen, Elmer V. H., Schindler, Frank, Tikhonov, Konstantin S., Mirlin, Alexander D., Neupert, Titus, Polyakov, Dmitry G., Gornyi, Igor V.·2018·Physical Review B

Abstract

We theoretically study the quench dynamics for an isolated Heisenberg spin chain with a random on-site magnetic field, which is one of the paradigmatic models of a many-body localization transition. We use the time-dependent variational principle as applied to matrix product states, which allows us to controllably study chains of a length up to $L=100$ spins, i.e., much larger than $L\ensuremath{\simeq}20$ that can be treated via exact diagonalization. For the analysis of the data, three complementary approaches are used: (i) determination of the exponent $\ensuremath{\beta}$ which characterizes the power-law decay of the antiferromagnetic imbalance with time; (ii) similar determination of the exponent ${\ensuremath{\beta}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}$ which characterizes the decay of a Schmidt gap in the entanglement spectrum; and (iii) machine learning with the use, as an input, of the time dependence of the spin densities in the whole chain. We find that the consideration of the larger system sizes substantially increases the estimate for the critical disorder ${W}_{c}$ that separates the ergodic and many-body localized regimes, compared to the values of ${W}_{c}$ in the literature. On the ergodic side of the transition, there is a broad interval of the strength of disorder with slow subdiffusive transport. In this regime, the exponents $\ensuremath{\beta}$ and ${\ensuremath{\beta}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}$ increase, with increasing $L$, for relatively small $L$ but saturate for $L\ensuremath{\simeq}50$, indicating that these slow power laws survive in the thermodynamic limit. From a technical perspective, we develop an adaptation of the ``learning by confusion'' machine-learning approach that can determine ${W}_{c}$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.98.174202

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Doggen, E. V. H., Schindler, F., Tikhonov, K. S., Mirlin, A. D., Neupert, T., Polyakov, D. G., & Gornyi, I. V.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2018-11-08
Volume
98
Issue
17
ISSN
  • 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9969
OpenAlex
W2899961353
Cited by
186
References
6
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Many-body localization and delocalization in large quantum chains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.98.174202
The paper
Doggen, E. V. H., Schindler, F., Tikhonov, K. S., Mirlin, A. D., Neupert, T., Polyakov, D. G., & Gornyi, I. V. (2018). Many-body localization and delocalization in large quantum chains. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.98.174202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.