The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accelerating crystal structure prediction by machine-learning interatomic potentials with active learning
Open accessAbstract
We propose a methodology for crystal structure prediction that is based on the evolutionary algorithm USPEX and the machine-learning interatomic potentials actively learning on-the-fly. Our methodology allows for an automated construction of an interatomic interaction model from scratch, replacing the expensive density functional theory (DFT) and giving a speedup of several orders of magnitude. Predicted low-energy structures are then tested on DFT, ensuring that our machine-learning model does not introduce any prediction error. We tested our methodology on prediction of crystal structures of carbon, high-pressure phases of sodium, and boron allotropes, including those that have more than 100 atoms in the primitive cell. All the the main allotropes have been reproduced, and a hitherto unknown 54-atom structure of boron has been predicted with very modest computational effort.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Gaussian Approximation Potentials: The Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics, without the Electrons
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.136403 · Cited by 3,242
Crystal structure prediction using ab initio evolutionary techniques: Principles and applications
Oganov, A. R., & Glass, C. W. (2006) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2210932 · Cited by 2,596
On representing chemical environments
Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.184115 · Cited by 2,572
ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost
Smith, J. S., Isayev, O., & Roitberg, A. E. (2017) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c6sc05720a · Cited by 1,921
Cited by
Performance and Cost Assessment of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials
Zuo, Y., Chen, C., Li, X., Deng, Z., Chen, Y., Behler, J., Csányi, G., Shapeev, A. V., Thompson, A. P., Wood, M. A., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.9b08723 · Cited by 968
Self-citationOn-the-fly active learning of interpretable Bayesian force fields for atomistic rare events
Vandermause, J., Torrisi, S. B., Batzner, S., Xie, Y., Sun, L., Kolpak, A. M., & Kozinsky, B. (2020) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-020-0283-z · Cited by 459
Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning
Batra, R., Song, L., & Ramprasad, R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y · Cited by 446
Innovative Materials Science via Machine Learning
Gao, C., Min, X., Fang, M., Tao, T., Zheng, X., Liu, Y., Wu, X., & Huang, Z. (2022) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202108044 · Cited by 198
Machine learning in materials design: Algorithm and application*
Song, Z., Chen, X., Meng, F., Cheng, G., Wang, C., Sun, Z., & Yin, W.-J. (2020) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abc0e3 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Podryabinkin, E. V., Tikhonov, E. V., Shapeev, A. V., & Oganov, A. R.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2019-02-27
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W2788484525
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 15.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
