The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shell structure of superheavy nuclei in self-consistent mean-field models
Open accessAbstract
We study the extrapolation of nuclear shell structure to the region of superheavy nuclei in self-consistent mean-field models---the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock approach and the relativistic mean-field model---using a large number of parametrizations which give similar results for stable nuclei but differ in detail. Results obtained with the folded-Yukawa potential which is widely used in macroscopic-macroscopic models are shown for comparison. We focus on differences in the isospin dependence of the spin-orbit interaction and the effective mass between the models and their influence on single-particle spectra. The predictive power of the mean-field models concerning single-particle spectra is discussed for the examples of ${}^{208}\mathrm{Pb}$ and the spin-orbit splittings of selected neutron and proton levels in ${}^{16}\mathrm{O},$ ${}^{132}\mathrm{Sn},$ and ${}^{208}\mathrm{Pb}.$ While all relativistic models give a reasonable description of spin-orbit splittings, all Skyrme interactions show a wrong trend with mass number. The spin-orbit splitting of heavy nuclei might be overestimated by 40%--80%, which exposes a fundamental deficiency of the current nonrelativistic models. In most cases the occurrence of spherical shell closures is found to be nucleon-number dependent. Spherical doubly magic superheavy nuclei are found at ${}_{184}^{298}114,$ ${}_{172}^{292}120,$ or ${}_{184}^{310}126$ depending on the parametrization. The $Z=114$ proton shell closure, which is related to a large spin-orbit splitting of proton $2f$ states, is predicted only by forces which by far overestimate the proton spin-orbit splitting in ${}^{208}\mathrm{Pb}.$ The $Z=120$ and $N=172$ shell closures predicted by the relativistic models and some Skyrme interactions are found to be related to a central depression of the nuclear density distribution. This effect cannot appear in macroscopic-microscopic models or semiclassical approaches like the extended Thomas-Fermi-Strutinski integral approach which have a limited freedom for the density distribution only. In summary, our findings give a strong argument for ${}_{172}^{292}120$ to be the next spherical doubly magic superheavy nucleus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Hohenberg, P., & Kohn, W. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b864 · Cited by 53,541
Nuclear Ground-State Masses and Deformations
Möller, P., Nix, J. R., Myers, W. D., et al. (1995) · Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables · doi:10.1006/adnd.1995.1002 · Cited by 3,963
Chabanat, E., Bonche, P., Pawel Haensel, A., Meyer, J., & Schaeffer, R. (1998) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(98)00180-8 · Cited by 2,065
The Relativistic Nuclear Many-Body Problem
Walecka, J. D. (1986) · NATO ASI Series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5179-5_8 · Cited by 1,740
Nuclear masses and deformations
Myers, W. D., & Swiatecki, W. J. (1966) · Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/s0029-5582(66)80001-9 · Cited by 1,577
On Closed Shells in Nuclei. II
Mayer, M. G. (1949) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.75.1969 · Cited by 1,050
Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov description of nuclei near the neutron-drip line
Dobaczewski, J., Flocard, H., & Treiner, J. (1984) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/0375-9474(84)90433-0 · Cited by 977
On the "Magic Numbers" in Nuclear Structure
Haxel, O., Jensen, J. H. D., & Sueß, H. E. (1949) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.75.1766.2 · Cited by 952
Relativistic mean field theory for finite nuclei
Gambhir, Y. K., Ring, P., & Thimet, A. (1990) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(90)90330-q · Cited by 879
Cited by
Tensor part of the Skyrme energy density functional: Spherical nuclei
Lesinski, T., Bender, M., Bennaceur, K., Duguet, T., & Meyer, J. (2007) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.76.014312 · Cited by 329
Self-citationThe reaction 48Ca + 248Cm → 296116* studied at the GSI-SHIP
Hofmann, S., Heinz, S., Mann, R., Maurer, J., Khuyagbaatar, J., Ackermann, D., Antalic, S., Barth, W., Block, M., Burkhard, H. G., et al. (2012) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1140/epja/i2012-12062-1 · Cited by 272
Nuclear quantum many-body dynamics: From collective vibrations to heavy-ion collisions
Simenel, C. (2012) · The European Physical Journal A · doi:10.1140/epja/i2012-12152-0 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Bender, M., Rutz, K., Reinhard, P.-G., Maruhn, J. A., & Greiner, W.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-08-11
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-490X
- OpenAlex
- W1973866744
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shell structure of superheavy nuclei in self-consistent mean-field models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.60.034304
- The paper
- Bender, M., Rutz, K., Reinhard, P.-G., Maruhn, J. A., & Greiner, W. (1999). Shell structure of superheavy nuclei in self-consistent mean-field models. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.60.034304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.