The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic study of highpThadron spectra inpp,pA,andAAcollisions at ultrarelativistic energies
Open accessAbstract
High-${p}_{T}$ particle spectra in $p+p(\overline{p}+p),$ $p+A,$ and $A+B$ collisions are calculated in a parton model with QCD-inspired hard scattering and evolution in which intrinsic transverse momentum, its broadening due to initial multiple parton scattering, and jet quenching due to parton energy loss inside a dense medium are included phenomenologically. The intrinsic ${k}_{T}$ and its broadening in $p+A$ and $A+B$ collisions due to initial multiple parton scattering are found to be very important at low energies $(\sqrt{s}<50$ GeV). Comparisons with S+S, S+Au, and Pb+Pb data with different centrality cuts show that the differential cross sections of large ${p}_{T}$ pion production ${(p}_{T}>1\mathrm{GeV}/c)$ in $A+B$ collisions scale very well with the number of binary nucleon-nucleon collisions (modulo effects of multiple initial scattering). This suggests that hard parton scattering is the dominant particle production mechanism underlying the hadron spectra at ${p}_{T}\ensuremath{\sim}2--10\mathrm{GeV}/c.$ However, there is no evidence of jet quenching or parton energy loss. Assuming this model of parton scattering, nuclear broadening and parton energy loss, one can exclude an effective parton energy loss ${\mathrm{dE}}_{q}/dx>0.01$ GeV/fm and a mean free path ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{q}<7$ fm from the experimental data of $A+B$ collisions at the SPS energies. Predictions for high ${p}_{T}$ particle spectra in $p+A$ and $A+A$ collisions with and without jet quenching at the RHIC energy are also given. Uncertainties due to initial multiple scattering and nuclear shadowing of parton distributions are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
hijing: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in pp , pA , and AA collisions
Wang, X.-N., & Gyulassy, M. (1991) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.44.3501 · Cited by 1,647
Self-citation
Cited by
Adcox, K., Adler, S. S., Afanasiev, S., Aidala, C., Ajitanand, N. N., Akiba, Y., Al-Jamel, A., Alexander, J., Amirikas, R., Aoki, K., et al. (2005) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.086 · Cited by 3,025
Self-citationNew forms of QCD matter discovered at RHIC
Gyulassy, M., & McLerran, L. (2005) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.034 · Cited by 1,122
Adams, J., Adler, C., Aggarwal, M. M., Ahammed, Z., Amonett, J., Anderson, B. D., Anderson, M., Arkhipkin, D., Averichev, G. S., Badyal, S. K., et al. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.072304 · Cited by 659
Self-citationCentrality Dependence of High-pTHadron Suppression inAu+AuCollisions atsNN=130 GeV
Adler, C., Ahammed, Z., Allgower, C., Amonett, J., Anderson, B. D., Anderson, M., Averichev, G. S., Balewski, J., Barannikova, O., Barnby, L. S., et al. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.202301 · Cited by 586
Adams, J., Adler, C., Aggarwal, M. M., Ahammed, Z., Amonett, J., Anderson, B. D., Anderson, M., Arkhipkin, D., Averichev, G. S., Badyal, S. K., et al. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.052302 · Cited by 555
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X.-N.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2000-05-23
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2156949966
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic study of highpThadron spectra inpp,pA,andAAcollisions at ultrarelativistic energies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevc.61.064910
- The paper
- Wang, X.-N. (2000). Systematic study of highpThadron spectra inpp,pA,andAAcollisions at ultrarelativistic energies. Physical Review C. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.61.064910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.