The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New potentialities of the Liège intranuclear cascade model for reactions induced by nucleons and light charged particles
Open accessAbstract
The new version (incl4.6) of the Li\`ege intranuclear cascade (INC) model for the description of spallation reactions is presented in detail. Compared to the standard version (incl4.2), it incorporates several new features, the most important of which are: (i) the inclusion of cluster production through a dynamical phase space coalescence model, (ii) the Coulomb deflection for entering and outgoing charged particles, (iii) the improvement of the treatment of Pauli blocking and of soft collisions, (iv) the introduction of experimental threshold values for the emission of particles, (v) the improvement of pion dynamics, (vi) a detailed procedure for the treatment of light-cluster-induced reactions taking care of the effects of binding energy of the nucleons inside the incident cluster and of the possible fusion reaction at low energy. Performances of the new model concerning nucleon-induced reactions are illustrated by a comparison with experimental data covering total reaction cross sections, neutron, proton, pion, and composite double-differential cross-sections, neutron multiplicities, residue mass and charge distributions, and residue recoil velocity distributions. Whenever necessary, the incl4.6 model is coupled to the ABLA07 de-excitation model and the respective merits of the two models are then tentatively disentangled. Good agreement is generally obtained in the 200 MeV to 2 GeV range. Below 200 MeV and down to a few tens of MeV, the total reaction cross section is well reproduced and differential cross sections are reasonably well described. The model is also tested for light-ion induced reactions at low energy, below 100 MeV incident energy per nucleon. Beyond presenting the update of the incl4.2 model, attention has been paid to applications of the new model to three topics for which some particular aspects are discussed for the first time. The first topic is the production of clusters heavier than alpha particle. It is shown that the energy spectra of these produced clusters are consistent with coalescence. The second topic regards the longitudinal residue recoil velocity and its fluctuations. Excellent results are obtained for these quantities. It addition, it is shown that the distributions of these quantities display typical random-walk characteristics, at least for not-too-large mass losses. They are interpreted as a direct consequence of the independence of successive binary collisions occurring during the cascade process. The last topic concerns the total reaction cross section and the residue-production cross sections for low-energy incident light ions. It is shown that our new model can give a rather satisfactory account of these cross sections, offering so an alternative to fusion models and the advantage of a single model for the progressive change from fusion to pre-equilibrium mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Durante, M. (2002) · La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento · doi:10.1007/bf03548911 · Cited by 38
Cited by
Allison, J., Amako, K., Apostolakis, J., Arce, P., Asai, M., Aso, T., Bagli, E., Bagulya, A., Banerjee, S., Barrand, G., et al. (2016) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.125 · Cited by 4,194
Self-citationThe FLUKA Code: Developments and Challenges for High Energy and Medical Applications
Böhlen, T. T., Cerutti, F., Chin, M. P. W., Fassò, A., Ferrari, A., Ortega, P. G., Mairani, A., Sala, P. R., Smirnov, G., & Vlachoudis, V. (2014) · Nuclear Data Sheets · doi:10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.049 · Cited by 1,758
Features of Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) version 3.02
Sato, T., Iwamoto, Y., Hashimoto, S., Ogawa, T., Furuta, T., Abe, S.-I., Kai, T., Tsai, P.-E., Matsuda, N., Iwase, H., et al. (2018) · Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/00223131.2017.1419890 · Cited by 1,287
Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System, PHITS, version 2.52
Sato, T., Niita, K., Matsuda, N., Hashimoto, S., Iwamoto, Y., Noda, S., Ogawa, T., Iwase, H., Nakashima, H., Fukahori, T., et al. (2013) · Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/00223131.2013.814553 · Cited by 853
Optimal shielding thickness for galactic cosmic ray environments
Slaba, T. C., Bahadori, A. A., Reddell, B. D., Singleterry, R. C., Clowdsley, M. S., & Blattnig, S. R. (2017) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2016.12.003 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Boudard, A., Cugnon, J., David, J.-C., Leray, S., & Mancusi, D.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-01-10
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2103506815
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.