Conformal energy-momentum tensor in curved spacetime: Adiabatic regularization and renormalization
Abstract
In preparation for an investigation of whether field-theoretic effects helped to make the early universe become isotropic, we seek to determine the physical (divergence-free) energy-momentum tensor through which the geometry of spacetime is influenced by a quantized scalar field with conformal ("new improved") coupling to the metric. The cosmological models studied are the Kasner-like (type I) metrics (homogeneous, spatially flat, nonrotating, but anisotropic), and also the isotropic Robertson-Walker metrics. The methods employed have previously been expounded in the context of a minimally coupled scalar field and a Robertson-Walker metric. Three divergent leading terms are extracted from an adiabatic expansion of the formal expressions for the expectation values of the energy density and pressures. In the Kasner case a slight reshuffling of the leading terms in the energy density displays all divergences to be proportional to either the metric tensor or a second-order curvature tensor which vanishes when the spacetime is isotropic; hence a finite energy-momentum tensor remains after renormalization of the cosmological constant and one other coupling constant in a generalized Einstein equation. In the Robertson-Walker cases, because of conformal flatness, there is no divergence beyond the usual quartically divergent constant vacuum energy; when the mass is not zero, however, a finite renormalization of the gravitational constant is suggested. The correctness of the methods is…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The adiabatic regularization procedure introduced by Parker and Fulling has only been shown equivalent to point-splitting when the scalar field is massless and conformally coupled and the spacetime M^{1,d-1}×S^1 is conformally flat (scale factors equal).
“The adiabatic regularization procedure introduced by Parker and Fulling [29,30], though well suited to cosmology, has only been shown to be equivalent to point-splitting when the scalar field is massless and conformally coupled, and the spacetime Mfoot_0, d-1 × S 1 is conformally flat i.e. when the scale factors of the two product spaces are equal [31].”
From Stress-energy tensor of a scalar field on a product spacetime with a time-dependent compact dimension (2026) · cites this paper as [31]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 17 · Cited by 295
- Authors
- Fulling, S. A., Parker, L., & Hu, B. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1974-12-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3905-3924
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969449595
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- conformal coupling, energy-momentum tensor, adiabatic regularization, renormalization, quantum scalar field, Kasner metric, Robertson-Walker metric, anisotropic cosmology, cosmological constant, vacuum energy, conformal flatness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review