The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Including higher order multipoles in gravitational-wave models for precessing binary black holes
Open accessAbstract
Estimates of the source parameters of gravitational-wave (GW) events produced by compact binary mergers rely on theoretical models for the GW signal. We present the first frequency-domain model for the inspiral, merger, and ringdown of the GW signal from precessing binary black hole systems that also includes multipoles beyond the leading-order quadrupole. Our model, PhenomPv3HM, is a combination of the higher-multipole nonprecessing model PhenomHM and the spin-precessing model PhenomPv3 that includes two-spin precession via a dynamical rotation of the GW multipoles. We validate the new model by comparing to a large set of precessing numerical-relativity simulations and find excellent agreement across the majority of the parameter space they cover. For mass ratios $<5$ the mismatch improves, on average, from $\ensuremath{\sim}6%$ to $\ensuremath{\sim}2%$ compared to PhenomPv3 when we include higher multipoles in the model. However, we find mismatches $\ensuremath{\sim}8%$ for a mass-ratio-6 and highly spinning simulation. We quantify the statistical uncertainty in the recovery of binary parameters by applying standard Bayesian parameter estimation methods to simulated signals. We find that, while the primary black hole spin parameters should be measurable even at moderate signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) $\ensuremath{\sim}30$, the secondary spin requires much larger SNRs $\ensuremath{\sim}200$. We also quantify the systematic uncertainty expected by recovering our simulated signals with different waveform models in which various physical effects---such as the inclusion of higher modes and/or precession---are omitted and find that even in the low-SNR case ($\ensuremath{\sim}17$) the recovered parameters can be biased. Finally, as a first application of the new model we analyze the binary black hole event GW170729. We find larger values for the primary black hole mass of ${58.25}_{\ensuremath{-}12.53}^{+11.73}\text{ }\text{ }{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ (90% credible interval). The lower limit ($\ensuremath{\sim}46\text{ }\text{ }{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$) is comparable to the proposed maximum black hole mass predicted by different stellar evolution models due to the pulsation pair-instability supernova (PPISN) mechanism. If we assume that the primary black hole in GW170729 formed through a PPISN, then out of the four PPISN models we consider only the model of Woosley [1] is consistent with our mass measurements at the 90% confidence level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249
Cited by
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, N., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agarwal, D., et al. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 · Cited by 1,754
Self-citationGW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M⊙
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agathos, M., et al. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.101102 · Cited by 1,303
Self-citationAbbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe949 · Cited by 889
Self-citationAbbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.122002 · Cited by 755
Self-citationGW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agathos, M., et al. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043015 · Cited by 657
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, S., Ohme, F., Chatziioannou, K., & Hannam, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2020-01-30
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2986151175
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Including higher order multipoles in gravitational-wave models for precessing binary black holes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.101.024056
- The paper
- Khan, S., Ohme, F., Chatziioannou, K., & Hannam, M. (2020). Including higher order multipoles in gravitational-wave models for precessing binary black holes. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.101.024056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.